Inter- and intra-observer repeatability of aortic annulus measurements on screening CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): Implications for appropriate device sizing. Issue 105 (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Knobloch, Gesine; Sweetman, Sarah; Bartels, Carrie; Raval, Amish; Gimelli, Georgio; Jacobson, Kurt; Lozonschi, Lucian; Kohmoto, Takushi; Osaki, Satoru; François, Christopher; Nagle, Scott
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 105(2018)
• Page Start: 209
• Page End: 215
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Aortic valve -- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement -- Heart valve prosthesis -- Tomography, X-ray computed -- Reproducibility of results; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: Multi-reader TAVR-CT evaluations have a lower measurement variability than single-reader measurements. Multi-reader approaches reduce the rate of discrepant device size categorization. Aortic annulus CT measurements for TAVR are highly reproducible. Abstract: Objectives: To investigate intra- and inter-observer repeatability of aortic annulus CT measurements for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by readers with different levels of experience and evaluate the impact of different multi-reader paradigms to improve prosthesis sizing. Methods: 82 TAVR screening CTAs were evaluated twice by three raters with six (R1 = radiologist), three (R2 = 3D-laboratory technician) or zero (R3 = medical student) years of experience. Results were translated into hypothetical TAVR size recommendations. Intra- and inter-observer repeatability between single readers and three different multi-reader paradigms ([A]: two readers, [B]: three readers, or [C]: two readers + an optional third reader) were evaluated. Results: Intra-observer variability did not differ significantly (range: 50.1–67.8mm2). However, we found significant differences in mean inter-observer variance (p = 0.001). Multi-reader paradigms led to significantly increased precision (lower variability) for scenarios [B] and [C] (p = 0.03, p < 0.05). Compared to single readers, all multi-reader strategies clearly lowered the rate of discrepant device size categorization between repeated measurements (22–26% to 5–10%). Conclusions: Aortic annulus CT measurements for TAVR are highly reproducible. Multi-reader strategies provide higher precision than evaluations from single readers with different levels of experience and could effectively be implemented with two readers and an optional third reader (Paradigm C) in a clinical setting.