Alter-geopolitics and the feminist challenge to the securitization of climate policy. Issue 3 (3rd March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boyce, Geoffrey Alan; Launius, Sarah; Williams, Jill; Miller, Todd
• Is Part Of: Gender, place and culture. Volume 27:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 394
• Page End: 411
• Publication Date: 2020-03-03
• Subjects: Climate change -- geopopulationism -- migration -- security -- feminist geopolitics -- alter-geopolitics -- social movements; Human geography -- Periodicals; Feminism -- Periodicals; Géographie féministe -- Périodiques; 305.305
• DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2019.1620698
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-369X

Abstract

Abstract: In the United States and beyond the challenges of global climate change are increasingly being governed via the militarization of nation-state borders rather than, or in addition to, the mitigation of carbon emissions and collective strategies for climate adaptation. In this article we apply the concept of "geopopulationism, " introduced by Bhatia et al. (this issue), to think through the zero-sum Manichaean logics of traditional geopolitical calculation and the ways these become applied to climate governance via the securitization of climate change-related migration. In order to disrupt this securitization of climate policy, we draw on the insights of feminist geopolitics and what Koopman calls "alter-geopolitics" to consider how contemporary grassroots movements like the Sanctuary movement and #BlackLivesMatter have made connections between political, economic and environmental vulnerabilities while developing relationships of solidarity and care that broaden, disseminate, distribute and regenerate security as an expansive and inclusive project. We conclude by considering ways that scholars can continue to ally ourselves with and contribute to these grassroots efforts.