An analysis of galaxy cluster mis-centring using cosmological hydrodynamic simulations. Issue 1 (1st February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yan, Z; Raza, N; Van Waerbeke, L; Mead, A J; McCarthy, I G; Tröster, T; Hinshaw, G
• Is Part Of: Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Volume 493:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 1120
• Page End: 1129
• Publication Date: 2020-02-01
• Subjects: hydrodynamics -- methods: numerical -- galaxies: clusters: general -- galaxies: groups: general -- dark matter -- large-scale structure of Universe; Astronomy -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 520.5
• DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0035-8711

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The location of a galaxy cluster's centroid is typically derived from observations of the galactic and/or gas component of the cluster, but these typically deviate from the true centre. This can produce bias when observations are combined to study average cluster properties. Using data from the BAryons and HAloes of MAssive Systems (BAHAMAS) cosmological hydrodynamic simulations, we study this bias in both two and three dimensions for 2000 clusters over the 10 13 –10 15 M⊙ mass range. We quantify and model the offset distributions between observationally motivated centres and the 'true' centre of the cluster, which is taken to be the most gravitationally bound particle measured in the simulation. We fit the cumulative distribution function of offsets with an exponential distribution and a Gamma distribution fit well with most of the centroid definitions. The galaxy-based centres can be seen to be divided into a mis-centred group and a well-centred group, with the well-centred group making up about $60{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ of all the clusters. Gas-based centres are overall less scattered than galaxy-based centres. We also find a cluster-mass dependence of the offset distribution of gas-based centres, with generally larger offsets for smaller mass clusters. We then measure cluster density profiles centred at each choice of the centres and fit them with empirical models. Stacked, mis-centred density profiles fit to the Navarro–Frenk–White dark matter profile and Komatsu–Seljak gas profile show that recovered shape and size parameters can significantly deviate from the true values. For the galaxy-based centres, this can lead to cluster masses being underestimated by up to $10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ .