Compulsory income management: Combatting or compounding the underlying causes of homelessness?. Issue 1 (30th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peterie, Michelle; Bielefeld, Shelley; Marston, Greg; Mendes, Philip; Humpage, Louise
• Other Names: Parsell Cameron guestEditor.; Vincent Eve guestEditor.; Klein Elise guestEditor.; Clarke Andrew guestEditor.; Walsh Tamara guestEditor.; Marston Greg guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Australian journal of social issues. Volume 55:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2019-09-30
• Subjects: BasicsCard -- Cashless Debit Card -- Compulsory Income Management -- conditional welfare -- homelessness; Australia -- Social policy -- Periodicals; Social service -- Australia -- Periodicals; Australia -- Social conditions -- Periodicals; Social conditions; Social service; Social policy; Australia; Periodicals; 362.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/ajs4.79
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0157-6321

Abstract

Abstract: Compulsory Income Management (CIM) is a form of conditional welfare that involves the mandatory quarantining of a portion of welfare recipients' social security payments. Quarantined funds are accessible via a government‐issued debit card, with restrictions surrounding where and on what funds can be spent. Official justifications of CIM have framed these policies as attempts to combat substance abuse and gambling problems, and to thus secure better outcomes for welfare recipients and their families. Central to this narrative has been the argument that welfare quarantining will ensure more money is spent on 'essentials', including accommodation. No existing studies, however, have specifically interrogated the impacts of CIM on housing security. This article responds to this gap in the literature by reviewing existing research concerning CIM's impacts and locating this research within broader debates regarding the causes of homelessness and the efficacy of individualised policy interventions. In doing so, it highlights CIM's potential to exacerbate housing insecurity not only through technical issues such as rental transfer failures, but also by contributing to underlying stressors such as economic disadvantage; relationship difficulties, poor health and addiction; and social stigma. The article concludes that – far from addressing the structural causes of homelessness – CIM has enflamed them.