Evaluation of some distributional downscaling methods as applied to daily maximum temperature with emphasis on extremes. (4th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lanzante, John R.; Adams‐Smith, Dennis; Dixon, Keith W.; Nath, Maryjo; Whitlock, Carolyn E.
• Is Part Of: International journal of climatology. Volume 40:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 1571
• Page End: 1585
• Publication Date: 2019-09-04
• Subjects: bias‐correction -- distributions -- perfect model evaluation -- statistical downscaling -- tail values; Climatology -- Periodicals; Climat -- Périodiques; Climatologie -- Périodiques; 551.605
• DOI: 10.1002/joc.6288
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-8418

Abstract

Abstract: Statistical downscaling methods are extensively used to refine future climate change projections produced by physical models. Distributional methods, which are among the simplest to implement, are also among the most widely used, either by themselves or in conjunction with more complex approaches. Here, building off of earlier work we evaluate the performance of seven methods in this class that range widely in their degree of complexity. We employ daily maximum temperature over the Continental U.S. in a "Perfect Model" approach in which the output from a large‐scale dynamical model is used as a proxy for both observations and model output. Importantly, this experimental design allows one to estimate expected performance under a future high‐emissions climate‐change scenario. We examine skill over the full distribution as well in the tails, seasonal variations in skill, and the ability to reproduce the climate change signal. Viewed broadly, there generally are modest overall differences in performance across the majority of the methods. However, the choice of philosophical paradigms used to define the downscaling algorithms divides the seven methods into two classes, of better versus poorer overall performance. In particular, the bias‐correction plus change‐factor approach performs better overall than the bias‐correction only approach. Finally, we examine the performance of some special tail treatments that we introduced in earlier work which were based on extensions of a widely used existing scheme. We find that our tail treatments provide a further enhancement in downscaling extremes. Abstract : This study compares the performance of seven distributional‐type statistical downscaling methods, with emphasis on the tails of the distribution. Output from a climate model under a climate change scenario is used in a "Perfect Model" evaluation. Skill for each method is represented by a different colour in the figure for several different testing scenarios. There is little difference in skill for the majority of the methods, although several (green, violet, and brown) perform consistently worse across scenarios.