Different expectations: A comparative history of structure, experience, and strategic alliances in the U.S. and U.K. poultry sectors, 1920–1990. (12th August 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Godley, Andrew C.; Hamilton, Shane
• Other Names: Wadhwani R. Daniel guestEditor.; Kirsch David guestEditor.; Welter Friederike guestEditor.; Gartner William B. guestEditor.; Jones Geoff rey G. guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Strategic entrepreneurship journal. Volume 14:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 89
• Page End: 104
• Publication Date: 2019-08-12
• Subjects: agribusiness -- comparative history -- entrepreneurial partnering -- periodization -- poultry farming -- strategic alliances -- temporal structuring; Entrepreneurship -- Periodicals; New business enterprises -- Planning -- Periodicals; 338.04
• DOI: 10.1002/sej.1334
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1932-4391

Abstract

Abstract: Research Summary: This comparative historical analysis demonstrates how memory and reflexive interpretations of the past can shape entrepreneurial willingness to collaborate with larger firms in an industry. Emphasizing the importance of spatial metaphors and periodization for developing historical knowledge, the paper focuses on how the historical space of experience explains how entrepreneurs make strategic choices regarding collaboration under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. Comparing the U.S. and U.K. emerging poultry sectors offers a methodologically novel analysis of an important but little‐studied agribusiness sector, offering a dual reading that compares two versions of historical reasoning both theoretically and empirically. Managerial Summary: Historical experience matters to entrepreneurs, shaping their expectations about markets and opportunities, including possibilities for strategic alliances with larger firms. Rather than assuming that the events of the past structurally determine entrepreneurial expectations for the future, we demonstrate how experience, interpretation, and memory shape the nature of competition and collaboration in emerging industries. Our approach relies on the comparative method, suggesting a new way to consider how uses of the past might shape entrepreneurship in industries other than the U.S. and U.K. poultry industries that serve as our empirical focus.