Treatment and clinical outcomes in anti‐p200 pemphigoid: a systematic review. (9th December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Treatment and clinical outcomes in anti‐p200 pemphigoid: a systematic review. (9th December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Treatment and clinical outcomes in anti‐p200 pemphigoid: a systematic review
- Authors:
- Laufer Britva, R.
Amber, K.T.
Cohen, A.D.
Kridin, K. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Current treatment paradigms in anti‐p200 pemphigoid rely on low levels of evidence, primarily originating from case reports and case series. Objective: To systematically review the utilized treatment modalities for anti‐p200 pemphigoid and to synthesize the available clinical outcomes of treated patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Ovid‐Medline (1946–2018), Embase (1947–2018) and Web of Science (1900–2018) databases with a broad and inclusive search strategy along with a subsequent search of retrieved articles. All case reports and case series of patients with anti‐p200 pemphigoid were included. Results: Sixty‐eight eligible studies comprising 113 anti‐p200 pemphigoid patients with a mean age of 65.5 years were included in the qualitative synthesis. The clinical outcome of patients following treatment was reported for 91 (80.5%) patients, of whom 83 (91.2%) had achieved complete remission at least once. Complete remission on‐therapy was observed in 51 (56.0%) and complete remission off‐therapy in 12 (13.2%) patients. Thirty‐six (39.6%) patients had experienced at least one flare during the duration of follow‐up. A combination of systemic corticosteroids and adjuvant immunomodulatory agents was the leading therapeutic approach (63.0%) required for disease control. Systemic and topical corticosteroids as monotherapy were sufficient to control the disease in 19.6% and 13.0% of cases, respectively. Dapsone was the mostAbstract: Background: Current treatment paradigms in anti‐p200 pemphigoid rely on low levels of evidence, primarily originating from case reports and case series. Objective: To systematically review the utilized treatment modalities for anti‐p200 pemphigoid and to synthesize the available clinical outcomes of treated patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature using Ovid‐Medline (1946–2018), Embase (1947–2018) and Web of Science (1900–2018) databases with a broad and inclusive search strategy along with a subsequent search of retrieved articles. All case reports and case series of patients with anti‐p200 pemphigoid were included. Results: Sixty‐eight eligible studies comprising 113 anti‐p200 pemphigoid patients with a mean age of 65.5 years were included in the qualitative synthesis. The clinical outcome of patients following treatment was reported for 91 (80.5%) patients, of whom 83 (91.2%) had achieved complete remission at least once. Complete remission on‐therapy was observed in 51 (56.0%) and complete remission off‐therapy in 12 (13.2%) patients. Thirty‐six (39.6%) patients had experienced at least one flare during the duration of follow‐up. A combination of systemic corticosteroids and adjuvant immunomodulatory agents was the leading therapeutic approach (63.0%) required for disease control. Systemic and topical corticosteroids as monotherapy were sufficient to control the disease in 19.6% and 13.0% of cases, respectively. Dapsone was the most commonly used (41.3%) adjuvant agent. The highest rates of complete remission were achieved in patients managed by systemic corticosteroids as monotherapy (100%) and in those managed by systemic corticosteroids with adjuvant agents (90.7%). Conversely, 45.5% of patients treated only by topical corticosteroids experienced at least one relapse during follow‐up. Conclusion: The vast majority of patients had reached a complete remission during the course of the disease, whereas a considerable proportion of patients experienced at least one relapse. A combination of systemic corticosteroids and adjuvant immunomodulatory agents was the most frequently utilized therapeutic approach. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. Volume 34:Number 3(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
- Issue:
- Volume 34:Number 3(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 34, Issue 3 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 34
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0034-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 465
- Page End:
- 472
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12-09
- Subjects:
- Dermatology -- Periodicals
Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals
616.5 - Journal URLs:
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14683083 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jdv ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09269959 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0926-9959;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/jdv ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jdv.15961 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0926-9959
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4741.624000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12976.xml