Effluent Storage and Biomat Occurrence among Septic System Absorption Field Architectures in a Typic Fragiudult. Issue 4 (1st July 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Prater, N. J. M.; Brye, K. R.; Dunn, S.; Soerens, T. S.; Sharpley, A. N.; Mason, E.; Gbur, E. E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of Environmental Quality. Volume 42:Issue 4(2013)
• Page Start: 1213
• Page End: 1225
• Publication Date: 2013-07-01
• Subjects: Agricultural ecology -- Periodicals; Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Pollution -- Periodicals; 630
• DOI: 10.2134/jeq2012.0373
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0047-2425

Abstract

Abstract : On‐site wastewater treatment systems (OWTSs) are commonly used by households in areas of low population density to treat household wastewater and recycle it back to the environment. However, new absorption field products of differing architecture types have recently become available. A 3‐yr field study was conducted in Bethel Heights, northwest Arkansas to assess several newer architecture types (i.e., chambers, polystyrene‐aggregate, and gravel‐less pipe) relative to the traditional pipe‐and‐gravel design under wet‐ and dry‐soil conditions. Thirteen products of four different architecture types were installed in 46‐cm‐deep trenches in a Captina silt loam (fine‐silty, siliceous, active, mesic Typic Fragiudult). Products were evaluated based on in‐trench solution storage measured with an electronic water‐level sensor approximately weekly from January 2009 through January 2012. Between May 2010 and January 2012, the thickness of any biomat formation was measured approximately weekly by insertion of a wooden dowel through in‐trench monitoring ports. Architecture type alone did not affect ( P > 0.05) in‐trench solution storage. However, solution storage among individual products differed under wet‐ and dry‐soil conditions ( P < 0.05). When present, biomat thickness differed significantly ( P < 0.05) among all four architecture types, ranging from 1.4 to 6.2 cm thick on average in the pipe‐and‐aggregate and polystyrene‐aggregate types, respectively. Regression analyses showed that biomat thickness increased in three products, did not change in nine products, and decreased in one product over time. Results showed that several currently approved alternative products had similar in‐trench solution storage but that several alternative products also had greater solution storage than that of the traditional pipe‐and‐gravel system. With no observed effluent surfacing, the soil morphology approach appears to be adequate and appropriately environmentally conservative for assigning typical single‐family loading rates to alternative OWTS products and to the traditional pipe‐and‐gravel system.