Contrasting Nutrient Mitigation and Denitrification Potential of Agricultural Drainage Environments with Different Emergent Aquatic Macrophytes. Issue 4 (1st July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Contrasting Nutrient Mitigation and Denitrification Potential of Agricultural Drainage Environments with Different Emergent Aquatic Macrophytes. Issue 4 (1st July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Contrasting Nutrient Mitigation and Denitrification Potential of Agricultural Drainage Environments with Different Emergent Aquatic Macrophytes
- Authors:
- Taylor, Jason M.
Moore, Matthew T.
Scott, J. Thad - Abstract:
- Abstract : Remediation of excess nitrogen (N) in agricultural runoff can be enhanced by establishing wetland vegetation, but the role of denitrification in N removal is not well understood in drainage ditches. We quantified differences in N retention during experimental runoff events followed by stagnant periods in mesocosms planted in three different vegetation treatments: unvegetated, cutgrass [ Leersia oryzoides (L.) Sw.], and common cattail ( Typha latifolia L.). We also quantified denitrification rates using membrane inlet mass spectrometry from intact cores extracted from each mesocosm treatment. All treatments retained 60% or more of NO3 − –N loads during the 6‐h experimental runoff event, but mesocosms planted with cutgrass had significantly higher (68%) retention than the cattail (60%) or unvegetated (61%) treatments. After the runoff event, mesocosms planted in cattail reduced NO3 − –N concentrations by >95% within 24 h and cutgrass achieved similar reductions within 48 h, whereas reductions in the unvegetated mesocosms were significantly less (65%). Cores from cutgrass mesocosms had significantly higher average denitrification rates (5.93 mg m −2 h −1 ), accounting for as much as 56% of the immobilized NO3 − –N within 48 h, whereas denitrification rates were minimal in cores from the unvegetated (−0.19 mg m −2 h −1 ) and cattail (0.2 mg m −2 h −1 ) mesocosms. Our findings have implications for mitigating excess NO3 − –N in agricultural runoff. While vegetatedAbstract : Remediation of excess nitrogen (N) in agricultural runoff can be enhanced by establishing wetland vegetation, but the role of denitrification in N removal is not well understood in drainage ditches. We quantified differences in N retention during experimental runoff events followed by stagnant periods in mesocosms planted in three different vegetation treatments: unvegetated, cutgrass [ Leersia oryzoides (L.) Sw.], and common cattail ( Typha latifolia L.). We also quantified denitrification rates using membrane inlet mass spectrometry from intact cores extracted from each mesocosm treatment. All treatments retained 60% or more of NO3 − –N loads during the 6‐h experimental runoff event, but mesocosms planted with cutgrass had significantly higher (68%) retention than the cattail (60%) or unvegetated (61%) treatments. After the runoff event, mesocosms planted in cattail reduced NO3 − –N concentrations by >95% within 24 h and cutgrass achieved similar reductions within 48 h, whereas reductions in the unvegetated mesocosms were significantly less (65%). Cores from cutgrass mesocosms had significantly higher average denitrification rates (5.93 mg m −2 h −1 ), accounting for as much as 56% of the immobilized NO3 − –N within 48 h, whereas denitrification rates were minimal in cores from the unvegetated (−0.19 mg m −2 h −1 ) and cattail (0.2 mg m −2 h −1 ) mesocosms. Our findings have implications for mitigating excess NO3 − –N in agricultural runoff. While vegetated treatments removed excess NO3 − –N from the water column at similar and significantly higher rates than unvegetated treatments, the high denitrification rates observed for cutgrass highlight the potential for permanent removal of excess N from agricultural runoff in vegetated ditches and wetlands. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of Environmental Quality. Volume 44:Issue 4(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Issue:
- Volume 44:Issue 4(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 44, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0044-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 1304
- Page End:
- 1314
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07-01
- Subjects:
- Agricultural ecology -- Periodicals
Environmental engineering -- Periodicals
Pollution -- Periodicals
630 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/15372537 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.2134/jeq2014.10.0448 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0047-2425
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14344.xml