CBMT-14. THE DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF BRAIN TUMOR TISSUE. (11th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Proescholdt, Martin; Haj, Amer; Doenitz, Christian; Brawanski, Alexander; Bomzon, Ze'ev; Sara Hershkovich, Hadas
• Is Part Of: Neuro-oncology. Volume 21(2019)Supplement 6
• Page Start: vi35
• Page End: vi36
• Publication Date: 2019-11-11
• Subjects: Brain Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Brain -- Tumors -- Periodicals; Brain -- Cancer -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Cancer -- Periodicals; 616.99481
• DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz175.136
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1522-8517

Abstract

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Recently, tumor treating fields (TTFields) were established for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM. One of the most crucial parameters defining the treatment efficacy of TTFields is the electric field intensity, which depends on the dielectric properties of the tumor tissue. In this study we determined the dielectric properties of brain tumors by analyzing resected tissue following a fast acquisition protocol. To account for the intratumoral heterogeneity, different regions of the tumor were analyzed separately. METHODS: A cohort of 84 patients with tumors of different histology have been recruited. Tissue probes were acquired from the vital tumor area and perinecrotic compartment. The tissue was measured immediately to avoid artifacts. A fragment was dissected from each tissue sample and was placed into a cylindrical cell with a known diameter. The impedance was recorded at frequencies 20Hz-1MHz using a software specifically developed for this study, which controls the LCR meter. The measured impedance was translated into dielectric properties of the sample (conductivity and relative permittivity) based on the parallel plate model, the recorded complex impedance and the geometry of the samples. Each tissue probe was fixed, H&E stained and histologically analyzed. RESULTS: We found significant differences between the conductivity of different types of tumors with meningiomas showing the lowest conductivity (mean conductivity [S/m]: 0.193; range: 0.327 – 0.113) and GBM tissue exhibiting the highest conductivity values (mean conductivity [S/m]: 0.402; range: 0.893 – 0.157). Consistently, the perinecrotic areas displayed lower conductivity values compared to the solid tumor compartments. Also, we found a significant intratumoral heterogeneity in tumors of one specific histological diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The dielectric properties of intracranial tumors appear to be depending on histological class and malignancy grade and show significant intratumoral heterogeneity. These results may allow a more precise modelling of electric field intensity distribution within the tumor.