P350 Right atrial remodelling in atrial fibrillation using three dimensional transthoracic echocardiography and strain imaging. (17th January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chalard, C; Soulat-Dufour, L; Lang, S; Ederhy, S; Ancedy, Y; Adavane-Scheuble, S; Chauvet-Droit, M; Nhan, P; Ben Said, R; Boccara, F; Cohen, A
• Is Part Of: European heart journal. Volume 21(2020)Supplement 1
• Publication Date: 2020-01-17
• Subjects: Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.10754
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez319.202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-2404

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Evaluation of right atrial cavities and right atrial (RA) remodelling in atrial fibrillation (AF) has been poorly studied. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate in AF, the role of three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and strain to refine the evaluation of the RA according to evolution of cardiac rhythm ad mid-term follow-up. Methods: A complete 2D and 3D TTE was performed in patient hospitalized for AF. In addition to the usual parameters, RA parameters were specifically assessed: 3D RA end-systolic (ES) and end-diastolic (ED) volume, RA ejection fraction (EF) and the global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the RA. A complete clinical evaluation and electrocardiogram were performed at admission (M0) and 6 months after inclusion (M6) to determine the cardiac rhythm at follow-up. Results: 34 consecutive patients hospitalized for AF were analysed. At M0, there was no significant difference between 2D RA ES volume and the 3D RA ES volume. Three groups of patients were individualized according to cardiac rhythm at M0 and M6: AF at M0 and AF at M6 (AF-AF), AF at M0 and sinus rhythm (SR) at M6 (AF-SR), SR at M0 (spontaneous reduction before the admission ECG) and SR at M6 (SR-SR). At M0 echocardiography, in the AF-AF group and AF-SR in comparison with SR-SR group were as follow: the 3D RA ED volume was significantly higher (respectively 21.6 (18.2-26.6) and 26.9 (19.4-36.8) versus 11.3 (6.9-16.6) mL/m2 ; p = 0.0025), the 3D RAEF was significantly lower (42.2 (35.1-44.7) and 34.5 (24.1-38.6) versus 57.6 (53.4-62.2)%; p = 0.0105) and the RA GLS was also significantly lower (7.6 (6.5-10.5) and 9.1 (5.8-11.2) versus 26.6 (22.0-35.0)%; p = 0.0001) (Figure 1). Conclusion: 3D ultrasound and strain could be useful tools for evaluating the anatomical and functional RA remodelling in AF, to be further validated in a larger ongoing study.