Holistic analysis of urban water systems in the Greater Cincinnati region: (1) life cycle assessment and cost implications. (1st February 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xue, Xiaobo; Cashman, Sarah; Gaglione, Anthony; Mosley, Janet; Weiss, Lori; Ma, Xin Cissy; Cashdollar, Jennifer; Garland, Jay
• Is Part Of: Water research. Number 2(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-02-01
• Subjects: Water -- Wastewater -- Urban water systems -- Life cycle assessment -- Environmental impacts -- Cost; Water supply -- Periodicals; Water-supply engineering -- Periodicals; Water -- Pollution -- Research -- Periodicals; 361.6105
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100015
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2589-9147

Abstract

Abstract: Urban water and wastewater utilities are striving to improve their environmental and economic performances due to multiple challenges such as increasingly stringent quality criterion, aging infrastructure, constraining financial burden, growing urban population, climate challenges and dwindling resources. Growing needs of holistic assessments of urban water systems are required to identify systems-level cross-domain solutions. This study evaluated the life cycle environmental and economic impacts of urban water and wastewater systems with two utilities in Greater Cincinnati region as a case study. The scope of this study includes the entire urban water and wastewater systems starting from raw water acquisition for drinking water to wastewater treatment and discharge. The detailed process-based life cycle models were developed based on the datasets provided by local water and wastewater utilities. The life cycle assessment indicated that the operation and maintenance of drinking water distribution was a dominating contributor for energy consumption (43%) and global warming potential (41%). Wastewater discharge from the wastewater treatment plant contributed to more than 80% of the total eutrophication potential. The cost analysis determined that labor and maintenance cost (19%) for wastewater collection, and electricity cost (13%) for drinking water distribution were major contributors. Electricity purchased by the utility was the driver for the majority of impact categories assessed with the exception of eutrophication, blue water use, and metal depletion. Infrastructure requirements had a negligible influence on impact results, contributing less than 3% to most categories, with the exception of metal depletion where it led to 68% of total burdens. Sensitivity analysis showed that the life cycle environmental results were more sensitive to the choice of the electricity mixes and electricity consumption than the rest of input parameters such as chemical dosages, and infrastructure life time. This is one of the first comprehensive studies of the whole urban water system using real case data. It elucidates a bigger picture of energy, resource and cost distributions in a typical urban centralized water system. Inherent to a modern city as large population centers, a significant expenditure has to be invested to provide water services function (moving water, treating water/wastewater) in order to avoid human and environmental health problems. This study provides insights for optimization potentials of overall treatment efficiency and can serve as a benchmark for communities considering adoption of alternative water systems. Highlights: Process-based LCA models reveals expenditure of all stages in an urban water system. Drinking water distribution is the major contributor to environmental impacts. The operational stages contribute to most environmental impact categories. The operational cost is sensitive to electricity mix, unit price and consumption. The LCA and LCC framework aids long-term balanced decision making.