Field-based evaluation of malaria outbreak detection and response in Mudzi and Goromonzi districts, Zimbabwe – 2017. Issue 12 (2nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hannah, Haylea; Brezak, Audrey; Hu, Audrey; Chiwanda, Simbarashe; Simckes, Maayan; Revere, Debra; Shambira, Gerald; Tshimanga, Mufuta; Mberikunashe, Joseph; Juru, Tsitsi; Gombe, Notion; Kasprzyk, Danuta; Montaño, Daniel; Baseman, Janet
• Is Part Of: Global public health. Volume 14:Issue 12(2019)
• Page Start: 1898
• Page End: 1910
• Publication Date: 2019-12-02
• Subjects: Malaria -- surveillance -- outbreak detection -- outbreak response; Public health -- Periodicals; 362.105
• DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1642367
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1744-1692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: National-level evaluations may fail to identify capacity improvements for detecting and responding to outbreaks which begin and are first detected at the local level. In response to this issue, we conducted a field-based assessment of the malaria outbreak surveillance system in Mashonaland East, Zimbabwe. We visited eleven clinics in Mudzi and Goromonzi districts. Twenty-one interviews were conducted with key informants from the provincial ( n = 2), district ( n = 7), and clinic ( n = 12) levels. Interviews focused on surveillance system activities, preparedness, data quality, timeliness, stability, and usefulness. Main themes were captured utilising standard qualitative data analysis techniques. While the surveillance system detects malaria outbreaks at all levels, we identified several gaps. Clinics experience barriers to timely and reliable reporting of outbreaks to the district level and staff cross-training. Stability of resources, including transportation (33% of informants, n = 7) and staff capacity (48% of informants, n = 10), presented barriers. Strengthening these surveillance barriers may improve staff readiness to detect malaria outbreaks, resulting in timelier outbreak response and a reduction in malaria outbreaks, cases, and deaths. By focusing at the local level, our assessment approach provides a framework for identifying and addressing gaps that may be overlooked when utilising tools that evaluate surveillance capacity at the national level.