Validation of contemporary electrocardiographic indices of area at risk and infarct size in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). (15th March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Validation of contemporary electrocardiographic indices of area at risk and infarct size in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). (15th March 2020)
- Main Title:
- Validation of contemporary electrocardiographic indices of area at risk and infarct size in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
- Authors:
- Du, Yang Timothy
Pasupathy, Sivabaskari
Air, Tracy
Neil, Christopher
Beltrame, John F. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) methods to assess area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been previously established but not validated against contemporary benchmark Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) measures. We compared ECG-determined and CMR-determined measures for (a) AAR, (b) IS, and (c) myocardial salvage. Methods: Sixty patients with ECG evidence of STEMI and CMR imaging performed within 13 days were included. The ECG-determined (a) AAR scores (Aldrich and Wilkins), (b) IS (Selvester score), and (c) myocardial salvage (i.e. [AAR-IS] / AAR × 100%), were compared with CMR-determined measures. Results: Compared with CMR-determined AAR, both the Wilkins & Aldrich scores underestimated AAR, although the Wilkins (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) showed a better correlation than the Aldrich (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 2.6% (95% limits of agreement: 18.5%, −13.3%) for the Wilkins and 5.9% (95% limits of agreement: 25.6%, −13.8%) for the Aldrich. Estimation of IS was similar between the Selvester score and CMR, with good correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and agreement (fixed bias 0.4%, 95% limits of agreement 20.8%, −15.5%). However, ECG-determined myocardial salvage significantly underestimated CMR-determined myocardial salvage, with an inverse correlation (r = −0.33, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Wilkins score is superior to Aldrich score as an ECG-AAR index, SelvesterAbstract: Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) methods to assess area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have been previously established but not validated against contemporary benchmark Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (CMR) measures. We compared ECG-determined and CMR-determined measures for (a) AAR, (b) IS, and (c) myocardial salvage. Methods: Sixty patients with ECG evidence of STEMI and CMR imaging performed within 13 days were included. The ECG-determined (a) AAR scores (Aldrich and Wilkins), (b) IS (Selvester score), and (c) myocardial salvage (i.e. [AAR-IS] / AAR × 100%), were compared with CMR-determined measures. Results: Compared with CMR-determined AAR, both the Wilkins & Aldrich scores underestimated AAR, although the Wilkins (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) showed a better correlation than the Aldrich (r = 0.54, p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 2.6% (95% limits of agreement: 18.5%, −13.3%) for the Wilkins and 5.9% (95% limits of agreement: 25.6%, −13.8%) for the Aldrich. Estimation of IS was similar between the Selvester score and CMR, with good correlation (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) and agreement (fixed bias 0.4%, 95% limits of agreement 20.8%, −15.5%). However, ECG-determined myocardial salvage significantly underestimated CMR-determined myocardial salvage, with an inverse correlation (r = −0.33, p = 0.01). Conclusions: The Wilkins score is superior to Aldrich score as an ECG-AAR index, Selvester score is a reasonable ECG estimate of infarct size, though ECG derived myocardial salvage does not have enough accuracy to be used in the clinical setting; it may be an inexpensive surrogate for myocardial salvage in large research studies. Further validation and prognostic studies are required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of cardiology. Volume 303(2020)
- Journal:
- International journal of cardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 303(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 303, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 303
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0303-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 7
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-15
- Subjects:
- Cardiology -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01675273 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01675273 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.10.041 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-5273
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.158000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12897.xml