Alterations to DNA structure as a cause of expression modifications of selected genes of known intrauterine‐growth‐restriction‐association shared by chosen species — a review. (1st October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rutkowska, Karolina; Lukaszewicz, Marek
• Is Part Of: Animal genetics. Volume 50:Number 6(2019)
• Page Start: 613
• Page End: 620
• Publication Date: 2019-10-01
• Subjects: DNA markers -- health status -- selection; Animal genetics -- Periodicals; 572.8
• DOI: 10.1111/age.12861
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-9146

Abstract

Summary: The review aimed at searching for DNA structure markers of epigenetic modifications leading to intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in three livestock species, mouse and human. IUGR affects mammals by harming their wellbeing and the profitability of breeding enterprises. Of the livestock species, we chose cow, pig and sheep owing to there being many reports on the epigenetics of IUGR. IUGR investigations in human and mouse are particularly numerous, as we are interested in our own wellbeing and the mouse is a model species. We decided to focus on five genes ( Igf2r, Igf2, H19, Peg3 and Mest ) of known IUGR association, reported in all of those species. Despite the abundance of papers on IUGR, naturally occurring mutations responsible for epigenetic modifications have been described only in human and cow. The effect of induced DNA structural modifications upon epigenetics has been described in mouse and pig. One paper regarding mouse was chosen from among those describing DNA modifications performed to obtain parthenogenetic progeny. Papers regarding pig parthenogenetic progeny described the epigenetics of genes involved in foetal development, with no interference with the genome structure. No reports on DNA modifications altering IUGR epigenetics in sheep were found. Only environmental effects were studied and we could not conclude from the experiment designs whether the gene setup could affect the expression of involved genes, as different populations were not included or not specified within particular experiments. Apparently, DNA markers of IUGR epigenetics exist. It has been reported that the small number of them, occurring naturally, may result from neglecting existing evidence of such selection or health status forecasting markers.