Is "including them" enough? How narratives of race and class shape participation in a resident-led neighbourhood revitalization initiative. Issue 98 (January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pothier, Melanie; Zewge-Abubaker, Nishan; Cahuas, Madelaine; Borstad Klassen, Carla; Wakefield, Sarah
• Is Part Of: Geoforum. Issue 98(2019)
• Page Start: 161
• Page End: 169
• Publication Date: 2019-01
• Subjects: Neighbourhood revitalization -- Health equity -- Community development -- Race -- Resident leadership -- Class; Geography -- Periodicals; Human geography -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Sciences de la terre -- Périodiques; Géographie -- Périodiques; Géographie humaine -- Périodiques; Aménagement du territoire -- Périodiques; Earth sciences; Geography; Human geography; Regional planning; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 304.205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.11.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-7185

Abstract

Highlights: Neighbourhood interventions focused on inclusion can still fail to address oppression for residents. Language around race, class, and neighbourhood change in equity-focused interventions can be ambiguous. Institutional support is needed to make neighbourhood interventions consistently inclusive. Abstract: This paper explores how one neighbourhood revitalization initiative addresses – or fails to address – intersecting systems of oppression as it seeks to facilitate resident-led change. Unlike many similar initiatives, the Neighbourhood Action Strategy in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada has an explicit focus on grassroots community development and resident leadership, and actors within the strategy have paid significant attention to issues of inclusion. We draw on in-depth interviews with City staff, local service providers, and neighbourhood residents, as well as on observation of neighbourhood meetings and media analysis, to explore how diversity, inclusion, and equity are understood and managed by different actors within the Strategy. We demonstrate that despite a stated mandate of inclusion, the initiative often struggles to engage significant participation from working-class and racialized people. We argue that this is in part due to complex interpersonal and institutional dynamics informed by race and class, which create significant tensions that ultimately limit the initiative's ability to create meaningful transformation. We conclude with some lessons learned about how to disrupt the racist, classist, and other oppressive discourses that can operate even within the most progressive initiatives.