Survival and predictors of outcome among patients with decompensated liver disease in a non‐liver transplant intensive care unit. Pessimism is historical and unjustified. Issue 6 (11th June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sadick, Victoria; Bowcock, Emma; Lane, Stuart; Seppelt, Ian
• Is Part Of: Internal medicine journal. Volume 49:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 745
• Page End: 752
• Publication Date: 2019-06-11
• Subjects: intensive care outcomes -- decompensated liver failure -- mortality -- prognostic scoring tools -- organ failure; Medicine -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1111/imj.14151
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1444-0903

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Recent literature emanating from the United Kingdom and United States has reported decreasing mortality rates in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and organ failures presenting to the intensive care unit (ICU). Aim: To determine if there were comparable outcomes in a single‐centre non‐transplant unit in Australia. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary, non‐liver transplant unit in Sydney, Australia. Admission data and mortality outcomes were collected from patients with cirrhosis non‐electively admitted to ICU between 2013 and 2017. Liver‐specific and general intensive care scoring tools were also assessed for their discriminative ability to predict short‐term prognostic outcomes. Results: Sixty‐three patients were admitted with decompensated liver disease who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The overall hospital mortality was 37% (95% CI: 0.26–0.49). There was no difference in survival based on aetiology of liver disease ( P = 0.96) but a significant difference was found based on the presenting diagnosis, with greater survival among patients diagnosed with hepatic encephalopathy on ICU admission ( P = 0.02). There was 4% mortality in patients with no organ failure and 52% mortality in those with ≥3 organs in failure ( P < 0.001). The ICU prognostic Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was the better discriminative tool in predicting short‐term outcomes when compared to liver prognostic scores. Conclusion: The outcomes of this single‐centre Australian study align with current overseas literature. These results reinforce and expand on limited local evidence, corroborating the former universal prognostic pessimism towards cirrhotic patients with organ failure as unwarranted.