Evaluation of the approach based on the concept of hyperbolicity breaking for prediction of flooding velocity of both room temperature and cryogenic fluids. (July 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhou, Rui; Yu, Liu; Xie, Huangjun; Qiu, Limin; Zhi, Xiaoqin; Zhang, Xiaobin
• Is Part Of: Cryogenics. Volume 93(2018)
• Page Start: 41
• Page End: 47
• Publication Date: 2018-07
• Subjects: Flooding -- Liquid nitrogen -- Inclined tube -- Hyperbolicity breaking; Low temperature engineering -- Periodicals; Low temperature research -- Periodicals; 536.56
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2018.05.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0011-2275

Abstract

Highlights: Concept of hyperbolicity breaking is evaluated to predict flooding velocity. Experimental data of room and cryogenic fluids with different inclinations are compared. Experiments for LN2 /VN2 flooding velocity are performed. Predictions are accordant for diameter d >9 mm, while fails for d ≤ 9 mm. Abstract: The theoretical approach for the prediction of flooding velocity based on the concept of hyperbolicity breaking was evaluated in the counter-current two-phase flow. Detailed mathematical derivations of neutral stability condition together with the correlation of the void fraction are presented. The flooding velocity is obtained by assuming that the wavelength at flooding is proportional to the wavelength of the fastest-growing wave at Helmholtz instability. Some available experimental data for different fluid pair flow in inclined tubes is adopted for comparison with the theoretical calculations, which includes the data of water/air, aqueous oleic acid natrium solution/air, Aq. butanol 2%/air and kerosene/air in the published papers, as well as the liquid nitrogen/vapor nitrogen by the present authors. The comparison of flooding velocity proves that the approach can predict the flooding velocity with accepted accuracy for the water/air and liquid nitrogen/vapor nitrogen flow if the tube diameter is greater than 9 mm. While the diameter is smaller than 9 mm, regardless of the inclinations and the fluid pairs, the error becomes larger relative to the cases of diameter larger than 9 mm. The calculations for small diameter cases also fail to predict the critical liquid velocity at which the flooding velocity of gas reaches the maximum value, as revealed by the experiments. The reasons for the increased errors were qualitatively explained.