The ability of young, middle-aged and older drivers to inhibit visual and auditory distraction in a driving simulator task. (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Karthaus, Melanie; Wascher, Edmund; Falkenstein, Michael; Getzmann, Stephan
• Is Part Of: Transportation research. Volume 68(2020)
• Page Start: 272
• Page End: 284
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Aging -- Distraction -- Driving -- Driving simulator -- Inhibition; Automobile drivers -- Psychology -- Periodicals; Automobile driving -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Transportation -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; 629.283019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-8478

Abstract

Highlights: Effect of distraction on braking response was investigated in different age groups. Braking response times increased with presence of additional distractor stimuli. Visual stimuli had a greater distraction effect than acoustic stimuli. Discrimination of relevant/irrelevant stimuli resulted in highest response times. Young and very old subjects showed highest response times in distractor-inhibition trials. Abstract: Driver distraction is one major cause of road traffic accidents. In order to avoid distraction-related accidents it is important to inhibit irrelevant stimuli and unnecessary responses to distractors and to focus on the driving task, especially when unpredictable critical events occur. Since inhibition is a cognitive function that develops until young adulthood and decreases with increasing age, young and older drivers should be more susceptible to distraction than middle-aged drivers. Using a driving simulation, the present study investigated effects of acoustic and visual distracting stimuli on responses to critical events (flashing up brake lights of a car ahead) in young, middle-aged, and older drivers. The task difficulty was varied in three conditions, in which distractors could either be ignored (perception-only), or required a simple response (detection) or a complex Go-/NoGo-response (discrimination). Response times and error rates to the critical event increased when a simultaneous reaction to the distractor was required. This distraction effect was most pronounced in the discrimination condition, in which the participants had to respond to some of the distracting stimuli and to inhibit responses to some other stimuli. Visual distractors had a stronger impact than acoustic ones. While middle-aged drivers managed distractor inhibition even in difficult tasks quite well (i.e., when responses to distracting stimuli had to be suppressed), response times of young and old drivers increased significantly, especially when distractor stimuli had to be ignored. The results demonstrate the high impact of distraction on driving performance in critical traffic situations and indicate a driving-related inhibition deficit in young and old drivers.