Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results. Issue 5 (June 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Riggs, William J.; Dwyer, Robert T.; Holder, Jourdan T.; Mattingly, Jameson K.; Ortmann, Amanda; Noble, Jack H.; Dawant, Benoit M.; Valenzuela, Carla V.; O'Connell, Brendan P.; Harris, Michael S.; Litvak, Leonid M.; Koka, Kanthaiah; Buchman, Craig A.; Labadie, Robert F.; Adunka, Oliver F.
• Is Part Of: Otology & neurotology. Volume 40:Issue 5(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-06
• Subjects: Cochlear implants -- Intracochlear electrocochleography -- Scalar translocation -- Trauma; Otology -- Periodicals; Ear -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Skull base -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.8005
• DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002202
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1531-7129

Abstract

Abstract : Hypothesis: Electrocochleography (ECochG) recorded during cochlear implant (CI) insertion from the apical electrode in conjunction with postinsertion ECochG can identify electrophysiologic differences that exist between groups with and without a translocation of the array from the scala tympani (ST) into the scala vestibuli (SV). Background: Translocation of the CI electrode from ST into SV can limit performance postoperatively. ECochG markers of trauma may be able to aid in the ability to detect electrode array-induced trauma/scalar translocation intraoperatively. Methods: Twenty-one adult CI patients were included. Subjects were postoperatively parsed into two groups based on analysis of postoperative imaging: 1) ST (n = 14) insertion; 2) SV (n = 7) insertion, indicating translocation of the electrode. The ECochG response elicited from a 500 Hz acoustic stimulus was recorded from the lead electrode during insertion when the distal electrode marker was at the round window, and was compared to the response recorded from a basal electrode (e13) after complete insertion. Results: No statistically significant change in mean ECochG magnitude was found in either group between recording intervals. There was a mean loss of preoperative pure-tone average of 52% for the nontranslocation group and 94% for the translocation group. Conclusions: Intraoperative intracochlear ECochG through the CI array provides a unique opportunity to explore the impact of the CI electrode on the inner ear. Specifically, a translocation of the array from ST to SV does not seem to change the biomechanics of the cochlear region that lies basal to the area of translocation in the acute period.