Histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms. Issue 6 (6th January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Park, Young Joo; Kim, Gwang Ha; Park, Do Youn; Lee, Sojeong; Lee, Moon Won; Lee, Bong Eun; Song, Geun Am
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 34:Issue 6(2019)
• Page Start: 1058
• Page End: 1065
• Publication Date: 2019-01-06
• Subjects: endoscopy: upper GI -- esophageal neoplasms -- esophagus; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14571
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: Endoscopic forceps biopsy results that reflect the final pathologic results of an entire lesion are essential for making accurate diagnoses and appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms (SESNs). This study investigated the histopathologic discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens to elucidate the factors contributing to such discrepancies. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved 77 patients (84 lesions) who underwent endoscopic resections for SESNs, between January 2005 and August 2017, at the Pusan National University Hospital. The SESNs were classified as low‐grade intraepithelial neoplasms (LGINs), high‐grade intraepithelial neoplasms (HGINs), or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Following slide reviews, the histopathologic concordance between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was assessed, in each case. Results: The histopathologic discrepancy rate between the endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens was 34.5% (29/84 lesions). Among the 29 diagnostically discordant lesions, upgrades and downgrades of the histopathologic diagnoses occurred for 27 and 2 lesions, respectively. The predominant discrepancies results in lesion upgrades from HGIN to SCC ( n = 21) and from LGIN to SCC ( n = 5). The two downgraded cases included one from SCC to HGIN and one from HGIN to LGIN. Multivariate analyses identified two factors that were significantly associated with the histopathologic discrepancies: upper esophageal location (odds ratio, 7.743; 95% confidence interval, 1.031–58.174; P = 0.047) and tumor area per biopsy ≥ 158.6 mm 2 /biopsy (odds ratio, 5.933; 95% confidence interval, 1.051–44.483; P = 0.044). Conclusion: Histopathologic discrepancies were observed between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens in patients with SESNs. Tumor location and tumor area/biopsy were both significantly associated with the discrepancies.