Prognostic value of radiologically determined sarcopenia prior to treatment in urologic tumors: A meta-analysis. Issue 38 (September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Jialin; Deng, Yinan; Zhang, Menghui; Cheng, Yusheng; Zhao, Xin; Ji, Zhigang
• Other Names: Wane. Daryle section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 98:Issue 38(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-09
• Subjects: kidney neoplasms -- mortality -- prognosis -- sarcopenia -- urinary bladder neoplasms; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017213
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Increasing evidence suggests that radiologically determined sarcopenia prior to treatment can serve as a prognostic marker in various tumors. However, there are conflicting conclusions about the prognostic role of sarcopenia in urological tumors. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between radiologically determined sarcopenia before treatment and survival outcomes in urological tumors. Methods: A systematically literature search in PubMed, Cochrane databases, and EMBASE was performed. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using STATA 12.0 software. Results: A total of 16 studies enrolling 2264 patients with urologic tumors were included in our meta-analysis. Among these studies, 13 studies with 1941 patients explored the association between sarcopenia and OS, and 10 studies with 1790 patients investigated the relationship between sarcopenia and OS. The synthesized result suggested that sarcopenia was significantly associated with poor OS (Fixed-effect model, HR 1.73, 95% CI: 1.48–2.01, P <.05; heterogeneity: P = .064; I 2 = 40.5%), and poor CSS (Fixed-effect model, HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.51–2.28, P <.05, heterogeneity: P = .053; I 2 = 46.2%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that sarcopenia was associated with poor OS and CSS, suggesting that sarcopenia may serve as a promising prognostic marker in urologic cancer patients. Considering several limitations in our study, in the future more high-quality studies on this topic should be conducted to confirm our findings.