Fixed effects in rare events data: a penalized maximum likelihood solution. Issue 1 (January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cook, Scott J.; Hays, Jude C.; Franzese, Robert J.
• Is Part Of: Political science research and methods. Volume 8:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 92
• Page End: 105
• Publication Date: 2020-01
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2018.40
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-8470

Abstract

Abstract: Most agree that models of binary time-series-cross-sectional data in political science often possess unobserved unit-level heterogeneity. Despite this, there is no clear consensus on how best to account for these potential unit effects, with many of the issues confronted seemingly misunderstood. For example, one oft-discussed concern with rare events data is the elimination of no-event units from the sample when estimating fixed effects models. Many argue that this is a reason to eschew fixed effects in favor of pooled or random effects models. We revisit this issue and clarify that the main concern with fixed effects models of rare events data is not inaccurate or inefficient coefficient estimation, but instead biased marginal effects. In short, only evaluating event-experiencing units gives an inaccurate estimate of the baseline risk, yielding inaccurate (often inflated) estimates of predictor effects. As a solution, we propose a penalized maximum likelihood fixed effects (PML-FE) estimator, which retains the complete sample by providing finite estimates of the fixed effects for each unit. We explore the small sample performance of PML-FE versus common alternatives via Monte Carlo simulations, evaluating the accuracy of both parameter and effects estimates. Finally, we illustrate our method with a model of civil war onset.