Detecting prolonged sitting bouts with the ActiGraph GT3X. (22nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kuster, Roman P.; Grooten, Wilhelmus J. A.; Baumgartner, Daniel; Blom, Victoria; Hagströmer, Maria; Ekblom, Örjan
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. Volume 30:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 572
• Page End: 582
• Publication Date: 2019-12-22
• Subjects: activPAL -- automated feature selection -- bout analysis -- machine learning -- posture prediction -- sedentary behavior; Sports medicine -- Periodicals; Sports -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; 617.1027
• DOI: 10.1111/sms.13601
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0905-7188

Abstract

Abstract : The ActiGraph has a high ability to measure physical activity; however, it lacks an accurate posture classification to measure sedentary behavior. The aim of the present study was to develop an ActiGraph (waist‐worn, 30 Hz) posture classification to detect prolonged sitting bouts, and to compare the classification to proprietary ActiGraph data. The activPAL, a highly valid posture classification device, served as reference criterion. Both sensors were worn by 38 office workers over a median duration of 9 days. An automated feature selection extracted the relevant signal information for a minute‐based posture classification. The machine learning algorithm with optimal feature number to predict the time in prolonged sitting bouts (≥5 and ≥10 minutes) was searched and compared to the activPAL using Bland‐Altman statistics. The comparison included optimized and frequently used cut‐points (100 and 150 counts per minute (cpm), with and without low‐frequency‐extension (LFE) filtering). The new algorithm predicted the time in prolonged sitting bouts most accurate (bias ≤ 7 minutes/d). Of all proprietary ActiGraph methods, only 150 cpm without LFE predicted the time in prolonged sitting bouts non‐significantly different from the activPAL (bias ≤ 18 minutes/d). However, the frequently used 100 cpm with LFE accurately predicted total sitting time (bias ≤ 7 minutes/d). To study the health effects of ActiGraph measured prolonged sitting, we recommend using the new algorithm. In case a cut‐point is used, we recommend 150 cpm without LFE to measure prolonged sitting and 100 cpm with LFE to measure total sitting time. However, both cpm cut‐points are not recommended for a detailed bout analysis.