The effect of travel costs on the ideal free distribution in stickleback. (25th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abrahams, Mark V.; Labelle, Jennifer
• Editors: Tregenza, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Ethology. Volume 126:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 353
• Page End: 362
• Publication Date: 2019-10-25
• Subjects: foraging -- habitat selection -- ideal free distribution -- travel costs -- undermatching; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1111/eth.12977
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0179-1613

Abstract

Abstract: The ideal free distribution (IFD) theory, which predicts that a population of individuals will match the distribution of a patchily distributed resource, is widely used in ecology to describe the spatial distribution of animals. While many studies have shown general support of its habitat matching prediction, others have described a systematic pattern of undermatching, where too many animals feed at patches with fewer resources, and too few animals feed in richer patches. These results have been attributed to deviations from several of the assumptions of the IFD. One possible variable, the cost of travelling between patches, has received little attention. Here, we investigated the impact on resource matching when travel costs were manipulated in a simple laboratory experiment involving two continuous input patches. This experiment allowed us to control for extraneous variables and decouple time costs from energetic costs of travel. Two experiments examined the impact of varying travel costs on movement rates between foraging patches and how these travel costs impact conformity to the IFD. Our data demonstrated that there was less movement between patches and greater discrepancies from the IFD predictions as the cost of travel increased.