Demand response potential of district heating and ventilation in an educational office building. (15th March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vand, Behrang; Martin, Kristian; Jokisalo, Juha; Kosonen, Risto; Hast, Aira
• Is Part Of: Science and technology for the built environment. Volume 26:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 304
• Page End: 319
• Publication Date: 2020-03-15
• Subjects: Heating -- Periodicals; Ventilation -- Periodicals; Air conditioning -- Periodicals; Refrigeration and refrigerating machinery -- Periodicals; Indoor air quality -- Periodicals; Indoor air quality; Air conditioning; Heating; Refrigeration and refrigerating machinery; Ventilation; Periodicals; 697
• DOI: 10.1080/23744731.2019.1693207
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2374-474X

Abstract

Abstract : This study examines the influence of demand-response control strategies on thermal conditions, indoor air CO2 concentration, and heating energy cost and consumption in an educational office building heated by a district heating system in a cold climate. The real-time pricing-based demand response is applied for space heating, heating of ventilation, and adjustment of airflow rates. The ventilation analysis covers both constant and variable air volumes systems. The applied demand-response algorithms regulate room air temperature set-points for space heating, temperature set-point for supply air, and CO2 set-point adjusted with the variable air volume ventilation system. The accepted room air temperature range was 20–24.5 °C and CO2 concentration within 800–1200 ppm. This study was conducted with the validated dynamic building simulation tool IDA ICE. The results illustrate that the maximum yearly savings by demand response of space heating and ventilation with the constant air volume ventilation system are around 3 and 6% for the heating energy consumption and heating energy cost, respectively. For the variable air volume system, the heating energy consumption, heating energy cost, electricity consumption, and electricity cost saved by demand-response control can be up to 8, 11, 9, and 2%, respectively.