Maintenance of deceptive gifts in a natural spider population: ecological and demographic factors. (6th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Albo, Maria J; Franco-Trecu, Valentina; Wojciechowski, Filip J; Toft, Søren; Bilde, Trine
• Is Part Of: Behavioral ecology. Volume 30:Number 4(2019)
• Page Start: 993
• Page End: 1000
• Publication Date: 2019-04-06
• Subjects: alternative mating tactics -- condition dependence -- male size–dependent tactics -- Pisaura mirabilis -- pre- and postmating sexual selection -- sperm competition; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Behavior evolution -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arz040
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-2249

Abstract

Abstract : Males of the spider Pisaura mirabilis offer a nuptial gift to females, usually an insect prey wrapped in silk. Sometimes males deceive females by offering a worthless gift that contains prey leftovers. The existence of 2 distinct life-history strategies (early small and late large body size) and survival differences through the mating season may explain the variation in tactic use by males. Abstract: Alternative mating tactics are expected to occur predominantly when mate competition is intense, resources are in short supply, or as a result of asymmetric power relationships between individuals. Males of the nuptial gift-giving spider Pisaura mirabilis use a prevailing tactic of offering a nutritive gift (insect prey) and a deceptive tactic of offering a worthless gift (consumed prey) to prospective mates. If the male's tactic depends on precopulatory male–male competition, worthless gifts should occur primarily late in the season, when the operational sex ratio (OSR) becomes male-biased. If it depends on resource availability and/or postcopulatory sexual selection (sperm competition), worthless gifts should occur mostly early in the mating season, when prey availability is low and most females are unmated (i.e., postcopulatory sexual selection is weak). Nuptial gift construction correlated positively with prey availability and negatively with OSR, suggesting that males increase reproductive effort when resource and mate availability increase. We did not find evidence for body condition affecting male tactic use. Male size had a marked effect on the reproductive tactic employed. Males that matured early in the season were very small and employed mostly the nutritive gift tactic during their short life. Among the males that matured later and persisted through the season, relatively small males employed the worthless gift tactic whereas large males employed the nutritive gift tactic. We suggest that the existence of 2 distinct life-history strategies among males (early small and late large size) interacts with environmental and demographic conditions to maintain the deceptive tactic.