ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions. (April 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions. (April 2020)
- Main Title:
- ZILVERPASS Study: ZILVER PTX Stent vs Bypass Surgery in Femoropopliteal Lesions
- Authors:
- Bosiers, Marc
Setacci, Carlo
De Donato, Gianmarco
Torsello, Giovanni
Silveira, Pierre Galvagni
Deloose, Koen
Scheinert, Dierk
Veroux, Pierfrancesco
Hendriks, Jeroen
Maene, Lieven
Keirse, Koen
Navarro, Tulio
Callaert, Joren
Eckstein, Hans-Henning
Teβarek, Jörg
Giaquinta, Alessia
Wauters, Jeroen - Abstract:
- Purpose: To report the 12-month results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent was noninferior in terms of safety and efficacy compared with surgical bypass.Materials and Methods: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.4%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.6%). Most of the lesions were occlusions (208, 94.5%); the mean lesion length was 247.1±69.3 mm. The primary outcome measure was primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass.Results: The estimated 12-month primary patency rate was 74.5% (95% CI 66.3% to 82.7%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 72.5% (95% CI 63.7% to 81.3%) for the bypass arm (p=0.998). Freedom from TLR at 12 months was 80.9% (95% CI 73.3% to 88.5%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 76.2% (95% CI 68.0% to 84.4%) for the bypass group (p=0.471). The 30-dayPurpose: To report the 12-month results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent was noninferior in terms of safety and efficacy compared with surgical bypass.Materials and Methods: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.4%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.6%). Most of the lesions were occlusions (208, 94.5%); the mean lesion length was 247.1±69.3 mm. The primary outcome measure was primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass.Results: The estimated 12-month primary patency rate was 74.5% (95% CI 66.3% to 82.7%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 72.5% (95% CI 63.7% to 81.3%) for the bypass arm (p=0.998). Freedom from TLR at 12 months was 80.9% (95% CI 73.3% to 88.5%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 76.2% (95% CI 68.0% to 84.4%) for the bypass group (p=0.471). The 30-day complication rate was significantly lower in the ZILVER PTX group (4.4% vs 11.3%, p=0.004). Also, procedure time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ZILVER PTX group (p<0.001 for both).Conclusion: With noninferior patency results, a lower complication rate, and shorter procedures and hospital stays, paclitaxel-eluting stenting might become a recommended treatment for long TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of endovascular therapy. Volume 27:Number 2(2020:Apr.)
- Journal:
- Journal of endovascular therapy
- Issue:
- Volume 27:Number 2(2020:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 27, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0027-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 287
- Page End:
- 295
- Publication Date:
- 2020-04
- Subjects:
- bypass surgery -- drug-eluting stent -- endovascular treatment -- femoropopliteal segment -- occlusion -- peripheral artery disease -- stenosis -- superficial femoral artery
Blood-vessels -- Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Angioscopy -- Periodicals
Intravenous catheterization -- Periodicals
Peripheral vascular diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Vascular Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Angioscopy -- Periodicals
Catheterization, Peripheral -- Periodicals
Peripheral Vascular Diseases -- therapy -- Periodicals
Angioscopie
Maladies vasculaires périphériques
617.413 - Journal URLs:
- http://jet.sagepub.com/ ↗
http://www.jevt.org ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/1526602820902014 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1526-6028
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12771.xml