Impact of liposomal bupivacaine on opioid use, hospital length of stay, discharge status, and hospitalization costs in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. (2nd December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Asche, Carl V.; Dagenais, Simon; Kang, Amiee; Ren, Jinma; Maurer, Brian T.
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical economics. Volume 22:Number 12(2020)
• Page Start: 1253
• Page End: 1260
• Publication Date: 2019-12-02
• Subjects: Analgesia -- arthroplasty -- liposomal bupivacaine -- Medicare -- bundled payments -- opioids -- pain management; I10 -- I13; Medical care -- Cost control -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- Periodicals; 362.10941
• DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1627363
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-6998

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Effective postsurgical analgesia hastens recovery, reduces hospital length of stay (LOS), and decreases hospitalization costs for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Improving these outcomes is critical for value-based surgical bundled payment programs such as the Medicare Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement and similar programs for commercial insurance providers. This study compared clinical outcomes and hospitalization costs for patients undergoing THA with and without liposomal bupivacaine (LB). Materials and methods: This retrospective, comparative cohort study used data from the Premier Healthcare Database from the 10 hospitals with highest use of LB for THA from January 2011 through April 2017. A cohort undergoing THA with LB at those hospitals was compared with a propensity-score matched cohort at those hospitals who had THA without LB. Descriptive, univariate, and multivariable analyses compared post-surgical inpatient opioid consumption, hospital LOS, discharge status, same-hospital readmissions, and total hospitalization costs. Analyses were performed using the Pearson Chi-square test (categorical variables) and Wilcoxon or Student t -test (continuous variables). Results: For patients with Medicare (with LB, n = 3622; without LB, n = 3610) and commercial insurance (with LB, n = 2648; without LB, n = 2709), use of LB was associated with lower post-surgical inpatient opioid consumption (105 and 81 mg, respectively; p < 0.0001), a 0.7-day shorter LOS ( p < 0.0001), a 1.6–1.7-fold increased likelihood of home discharge ( p < 0.0001), and no increase in readmissions ( p ≥ 0.103). Total hospitalization costs were $561 lower with LB in the Medicare population ( p < 0.0001) and $41 higher with LB in the commercial population ( p = 0.7697). Limitations: Hospitalization costs were estimated from the hospital chargemaster. Findings from these 10 hospitals may not represent other US hospitals. Conclusions: At select hospitals, THA with LB was associated with reduced post-surgical inpatient opioid consumption, shorter hospital LOS, increased likelihood of home discharge, and lower hospitalization costs. Post-surgical pain management with LB may help hospitals in value-based bundled payment programs.