Motor-Equivalent Intersegmental Coordination Is Impaired in Chronic Stroke. (March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Subramanian, Sandeep K.; Baniña, Melanie C.; Sambasivan, Krithika; Haentjens, Katherine; Finestone, Hillel M.; Sveistrup, Heidi; Levin, Mindy F.
• Is Part Of: Neurorehabilitation & neural repair. Volume 34:Number 3(2020)
• Page Start: 210
• Page End: 221
• Publication Date: 2020-03
• Subjects: cerebrovascular accident -- kinematics -- upper limb -- arm-trunk coordination; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Brain damage -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Spinal cord -- Wounds and injuries -- Patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Regeneration -- Periodicals; Neuroplasticity -- Periodicals; 616.804305
• DOI: 10.1177/1545968319899912
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-9683

Abstract

Background . Kinematic abundance permits using different movement patterns for task completion. Individuals poststroke may take advantage of abundance by using compensatory trunk displacement to overcome upper limb (UL) movement deficits. However, movement adaptation in tasks requiring specific intersegment coordination may remain limited. Objective . We tested movement adaptation in both arms of individuals with chronic stroke (n = 16) and nondominant arms of controls (n = 12) using 2 no-vision reaching tasks involving trunk movement (40 trials/arm). Methods . In the "stationary hand task" (SHT), subjects maintained the hand motionless over a target while leaning the trunk forward. In the "reaching hand task" (RHT), subjects reached to the target while leaning forward. For both tasks, trunk movement was unexpectedly blocked in 40% of trials to assess the influence of trunk movement on adaptive arm positioning or reaching. UL sensorimotor impairment, activity, and sitting balance were assessed in the stroke group. The primary outcome measure for SHT was gain ( g ), defined as the extent to which trunk displacement contributing to hand motion was offset by appropriate changes in UL movements ( g = 1: complete compensation) and endpoint deviation for RHT. Results . Individuals poststroke had lower gains and greater endpoint deviation using the more-affected compared with less-affected UL and controls. Those with less sensorimotor impairment, greater activity levels, and better sitting balance had higher gains and smaller endpoint deviations. Lower gains were associated with diminished UL adaptability. Conclusions . Tests of condition-specific adaptability of interjoint coordination may be used to measure UL adaptability and changes in adaptability with treatment.