A Comparison of Two Models to Evaluate Soil Physical Property Effects on Corn Root Growth. (1st May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Benjamin, Joseph G.; Nielsen, David C.; Vigil, Merle F.; Mikha, Maysoon M.; Calderon, Francisco J.
• Is Part Of: Agronomy Journal. Volume 105:Number 3(2013)
• Page Start: 713
• Page End: 720
• Publication Date: 2013-05-01
• Subjects: Agronomy -- Periodicals; 630
• DOI: 10.2134/agronj2012.0104
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-1962

Abstract

Abstract : Two models for evaluating soil physical condition effects on root growth were compared. The first model, called the Jones model, is a submodel for root growth limitations used by several complex soil–plant–atmosphere models. The second model uses soil physical limitations as identified by the least limiting water range (LLWR). Root surface area density ( R sa ) and bulk density (ρ b ) were determined at the V6, V12, and R1 growth stages of corn in 2004. Water contents (θ ) throughout the growing season were determined twice per week with a neutron probe. The cumulative predicted relative root growth suitability ( P RGS ) was determined using soil physical limitations to root growth defined by each model. Significant plot‐to‐plot variability was observed in ρ b and θ . The LLWR resulted in a wider range of P RGS for all sampling times and soil depths. Regressions using the LLWR criteria for soil physical limitations resulted in significant correlations between R sa with P RGS at the expanding zone of root exploration, indicating more root surface area with better soil conditions. Regressions using the Jones criteria for soil physical limitations resulted in either a nonsignificant correlation between R sa with P RGS or a linear, negative correlation, indicating less root surface area with better soil conditions. Using limitations of soil physical properties as identified by the LLWR in larger, more comprehensive plant and root growth models may provide a better response of these models to variable soil conditions.