Efficacy of λ-cyhalothrin, amitraz, and phoxim against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae De Geer, 1778 (Mesostigmata: Dermanyssidae): an eight-year survey. (13th September 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pugliese, Nicola; Circella, Elena; Cocciolo, Giulio; Giangaspero, Annunziata; Horvatek Tomic, Danijela; Kika, Tana Shtylla; Caroli, Anna; Camarda, Antonio
• Is Part Of: Avian pathology. Volume 48(2019)Supplement 1
• Page Start: S35
• Page End: S43
• Publication Date: 2019-09-13
• Subjects: Dermanyssus gallinae -- red mite -- susceptibility -- Italy -- λ-cyhalothrin -- amitraz -- phoxim; Poultry -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Birds -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 571.918
• DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1645295
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0307-9457

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778) is a major problem for the poultry industry worldwide, as it negatively affects virtually all kinds of rearing systems. Therefore, the control of infestation has become a routine process, and its economic cost is constantly increasing. Until now, most of the control strategies have relied on the use of synthetic chemical drugs, but their efficacy is often questioned by the emergence and diffusion of resistant mite populations. With this in mind, the efficacy of λ -cyhalothrin, amitraz, and phoxim has been verified by testing them against 86 mite populations collected from the same number of poultry farms in Italy from 2008 to 2015. Assays were performed according to the filter paper method using the recommended, half, quarter, double and quadruple doses. The results showed that phoxim and amitraz were the most effective acaricides (median efficacies 80.35% and 80.83%, respectively), but amitraz exhibited a sharp fall in its efficacy during 2011 and 2012, while phoxim maintained its high effectiveness up to 2015, when it dropped. The overall median efficacy of λ -cyhalothrin was 58.33%. The data also highlighted the importance of the use of the right concentration, as an increase in dosage was not always useful against resistant populations, while its reduction also diminished efficacy, simultaneously increasing the risk for the development of resistance.