Acceptability of internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (i-CBT) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): a systematic review. Issue 1 (1st January 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Simon, Natalie; McGillivray, Leah; Roberts, Neil P.; Barawi, Kali; Lewis, Catrin E.; Bisson, Jonathan I.
• Is Part Of: European journal of psychotraumatology. Volume 10:Issue 1(2019)
• Publication Date: 2019-01-01
• Subjects: Post-traumatic stress disorder -- PTSD -- cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) -- guided self help (GSH) -- stress disorders -- post-traumatic -- treatment adherence and compliance -- patient dropouts; Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático -- TEPT -- Terapia Cognitivo Conductual -- Autoayuda Guiada -- Trastornos de Estrés -- Postraumáticos -- Adherencia y Cumplimiento del Tratamiento -- Abandono de Pacientes; 创伤后应激障碍 -- PTSD -- 认知行为疗法 -- 引导性自助 -- 应激障碍，创伤后 -- 治疗依从性和依从性 -- 患者脱落; A review of acceptability of internet-delivered CBT (i-CBT) for PTSD. I-CBT is a potentially acceptable psychological treatment for PTSD. Small number of studies limits generalisability of findings. Standardised, consistent acceptability measurement is needed.; Post-traumatic stress disorder -- Periodicals; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic; Post-traumatic stress disorder; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 616.8521
• DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1646092
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2000-8198

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background : Internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (i-CBT) offers potential as an alternative, accessible, clinically and cost-effective treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but little is known about its acceptability. Objective : To review the available evidence to understand the acceptability of i-CBT for PTSD. Method : We undertook a mixed-methods systematic review according to Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of i-CBT for adults with PTSD. We examined included studies for measures of acceptability, and possible proxy indicators of acceptability, including dropout rates, which were meta-analysed as risk ratios (RRs). Results : Ten studies with 720 participants were included. We found i-CBT to be acceptable according to specific acceptability measures, and suggestions for acceptability according to some proxy measures of i-CBT programme usage. There was, however, evidence of greater dropout from i-CBT than waitlist (RR 1.39, CI 1.03–1.88; 8 studies; participants = 585) and no evidence of a difference in dropout between i-CBT and i-non-CBT (RR 2.14, CI 0.97–4.73; participants = 132; 2 studies). Conclusion : i-CBT appears a potentially acceptable intervention for adults with PTSD. We identified clinical and research questions, including the status of proxy indicators, and call for standardised, consistent treatment acceptability measurement.