Jesuit Probabilistic Logic between Scholastic and Academic Philosophy. Issue 4 (2nd October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hanke, Miroslav
• Is Part Of: History and philosophy of logic. Volume 40:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 355
• Page End: 373
• Publication Date: 2019-10-02
• Subjects: Logic -- Periodicals; 160.905
• DOI: 10.1080/01445340.2019.1615363
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-5340

Abstract

Abstract : There is a well-documented paradigm-shift in eighteenth century Jesuit philosophy and science, at the very least in Central Europe: traditional scholastic version(s) of Aristotelianism were replaced by early modern rationalism (Wolff's systematisation of Leibnizian philosophy) and early modern science and mathematics. In the field of probability, this meant that the traditional Jesuit engagement with probability, uncertainty, and truthlikeness (in particular, as applied to moral theology) could translate into mathematical language, and can be analysed against the background of the accounts of probability, pre-mathematical Jesuit logic, Wolff's conceptual analysis, and Bernoullian mathematisation. The works of two Jesuit philosophers, Berthold Hauser and Sigismund Storchenau, can be related to this context. The core of their logic of (epistemic) probability is the account of negation (or 'contradiction') and implication (or 'argument'), in particular, the algorithms for computing the reliability of one piece of evidence when compared to the respective counter-evidence and for computing the probability of a conclusion given the probability of its premises.