Performance pedagogy at play: pupils perspectives on primary PE. Issue 1 (2nd January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Stirrup, Julie
• Is Part Of: Sport, education and society. Volume 25:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 14
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2020-01-02
• Subjects: Physical education -- pedagogy -- outsourcing -- ability -- pedagogic device; Physical education and training -- Periodicals; School sports -- Periodicals; Sports -- Periodicals; 796.07
• DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2018.1554562
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1357-3322

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Physical education (PE) in England, has historically been and is increasingly seen as a subject in which political agendas can and are being enacted (Penney, [2008]. Playing a political game and playing for position: Policy and curriculum development in health and PE. European Physical Education Review 4 (1): 33–49) as health, sport and /or leisure agendas compete for space against educational aspirations (Houlihan & Green, [2006]. The changing status of school sport and physical education: Explaining policy change. Sport, Education and Society 11 (1): 73–92). Against this backdrop, in 2012, the U.K. Government announced the launch of 'Primary PE and Sport Premium' (PPESP) funding (amounting to £450 million) for English primary schools, initially for three years (although later extended). Drawing on the theoretical work of Basil Bernstein, particularly his concepts, 'pedagogic device' (PD) and 'classification' (c) and 'framing' (f), this paper sets out to explore how, in a neo liberal outsourced world of primary physical education (PPE), pupils construct knowledge of PE. The analyses illustrate how a performance pedagogy appears to dominate the school setting this research took place in. There was a clear focus on sport rather than PE which in turns impacted how pupils saw PE and construct understandings of ability linked to PE, raising questions over the future direction of the subject.