Adapting to climate change: an assessment of local adaptation planning processes in forest-based communities in Nepal. (26th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Silwal, Pratigya; Roberts, Lin; Rennie, Hamish G.; Lexer, Manfred J.
• Is Part Of: Climate and development. Volume 11:Number 10(2019)
• Page Start: 886
• Page End: 898
• Publication Date: 2019-11-26
• Subjects: Local adaptation plan of Action (LAPA) -- planning approaches -- community -- bottom-up -- forests -- sustainable development -- vulnerability; Climatic changes -- Periodicals; Climatic changes -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Climatic changes -- Economic aspects -- Periodicals; Global temperature changes -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; 363.7387405
• DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1586634
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-5529

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Since 2000, adaptation has been the focus of the response to climate change in many least developed countries. However, there are recognized overlaps and tensions between mitigation, adaptation and development, and between top-down and community-based approaches to adaptation. This paper explores the approaches used to develop Local Adaptation Plans of Action (LAPAs) by three different programmes in the forest sector of Nepal. The analysis of information drawn from 37 interviews, with government, non-government and community representatives at national, district and local levels, shows that although the LAPAs in Nepal are prepared with limited external and scientific contribution, they are rich with local information. However, the limited knowledge and capacity of local people in relation to specific climate change impacts and potential solutions mean the plans bear little difference to regular development activities. Nearly all the activities identified contributed to adaptation and mitigation, as well as economic development, within a context of environmental sustainability, but appeared not to address the social equity and justice aspects of social sustainability. Moreover, this article argues that the community has greater confidence in plans prepared when donor funding is channelled through existing government mechanisms than through more directly donor funded approaches. It may continue to be necessary to keep adaptation plans separate from development plans until there is a greater understanding of the means to and need for adaptation as part of mainstream development planning.