Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management. (3rd October 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management. (3rd October 2019)
- Main Title:
- Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management
- Authors:
- Ludden, Thomas
Shade, Lindsay
Reeves, Kelly
Welch, Madelyn
Taylor, Yhenneko J.
Mohanan, Sveta
McWilliams, Andrew
Halladay, Jacqueline
Donahue, Katrina
Coyne-Beasley, Tamera
Dolor, Rowena J.
Bray, Paul
Tapp, Hazel - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objective : To compare three dissemination approaches for implementing an asthma shared decision-making (SDM) intervention into primary care practices. Methods : We randomized thirty practices into three study arms: (1) a facilitator-led approach to implementing SDM; (2) a one-hour lunch-and-learn training on SDM; and (3) a control group with no active intervention. Patient perceptions of SDM were assessed in the active intervention arms using a one-question anonymous survey. Logistic regression models compared the frequency of asthma exacerbations (emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and oral steroid prescriptions) between the three arms. Results : We collected 705 surveys from facilitator-led sites and 523 from lunch-and-learn sites. Patients were more likely to report that they participated equally with the provider in making the treatment decision in the facilitator-led sites (75% vs. 66%, p = 0.001). Comparisons of outcomes for patients in the facilitator-led ( n = 1, 658) and lunch-and-learn ( n = 2, 613) arms respectively vs. control ( n = 2, 273) showed no significant differences for ED visits (Odds Ratio [OR] [95%CI] = 0.77[0.57–1.04]; 0.83[0.66–1.07]), hospitalizations (OR [95%CI] = 1.30[0.59–2.89]; 1.40 [0.68–3.06]), or oral steroids (OR [95%CI] =0.95[0.79–1.15]; 1.03[0.81–1.06]). Conclusion : Facilitator-led dissemination was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients sharing equally in decision-making with theAbstract: Objective : To compare three dissemination approaches for implementing an asthma shared decision-making (SDM) intervention into primary care practices. Methods : We randomized thirty practices into three study arms: (1) a facilitator-led approach to implementing SDM; (2) a one-hour lunch-and-learn training on SDM; and (3) a control group with no active intervention. Patient perceptions of SDM were assessed in the active intervention arms using a one-question anonymous survey. Logistic regression models compared the frequency of asthma exacerbations (emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and oral steroid prescriptions) between the three arms. Results : We collected 705 surveys from facilitator-led sites and 523 from lunch-and-learn sites. Patients were more likely to report that they participated equally with the provider in making the treatment decision in the facilitator-led sites (75% vs. 66%, p = 0.001). Comparisons of outcomes for patients in the facilitator-led ( n = 1, 658) and lunch-and-learn ( n = 2, 613) arms respectively vs. control ( n = 2, 273) showed no significant differences for ED visits (Odds Ratio [OR] [95%CI] = 0.77[0.57–1.04]; 0.83[0.66–1.07]), hospitalizations (OR [95%CI] = 1.30[0.59–2.89]; 1.40 [0.68–3.06]), or oral steroids (OR [95%CI] =0.95[0.79–1.15]; 1.03[0.81–1.06]). Conclusion : Facilitator-led dissemination was associated with a significantly higher proportion of patients sharing equally in decision-making with the provider compared to a traditional lunch-and-learn approach. While there was no significant difference in health outcomes between the three arms, the results were most likely confounded by a concurrent statewide asthma initiative and the pragmatic implementation of the intervention. These results offer support for the use of structured approaches such as facilitator-led dissemination of complex interventions into primary care practices. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of asthma. Volume 56:Number 10(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of asthma
- Issue:
- Volume 56:Number 10(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 10 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0056-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1087
- Page End:
- 1098
- Publication Date:
- 2019-10-03
- Subjects:
- Shared decision making -- asthma -- practice-based research -- primary care
Asthma -- Periodicals
616.238005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ytsr20#.V6niC1JTF-V ↗
http://informahealthcare.com/journal/jas ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/02770903.2018.1514630 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-0903
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4947.295000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12709.xml