An experimental study of methods for the analysis of variance components in the inference of laboratory information. (2nd January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kallner, Anders; Theodorsson, Elvar
• Is Part Of: Scandinavian journal of clinical & laboratory investigation. Volume 80:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: 73
• Page End: 80
• Publication Date: 2020-01-02
• Subjects: Dahlberg error -- repeatability -- reproducibility -- measurement uncertainty -- variance components -- analytical sensitivity; Clinical biochemistry -- Periodicals; Physiology, Pathological -- Periodicals; Physiology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; 616.0072
• DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1700426
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0036-5513

Abstract

Abstract: Measurement uncertainty (MU) can be estimated and calculated by different procedures, representing different aspects and intended use. It is appropriate to distinguish between uncertainty determined under repeatability and reproducibility conditions, and to distinguish causes of variation using analysis of variance components. The intra-laboratory MU is frequently determined by repeated measurements of control material(s) of one or several concentrations during a prolonged period of time. We demonstrate, based on experimental results, how such results can be used to identify the repeatability, 'pure' reproducibility and intra-laboratory variance as the sum of the two. Native patient material was used to establish repeatability using the Dahlberg formula for random differences between measurements and an expanded Dahlberg formula if a non-random difference, e.g. bias, was expected. Repeatability and reproducibility have different clinical relevance in intensive care compared to monitoring treatment of chronic diseases, comparison with reference intervals or screening.