Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent: insights from the UK. Issue 2 (1st February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McCann, Philip
• Is Part Of: Regional studies. Volume 54:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 256
• Page End: 267
• Publication Date: 2020-02-01
• Subjects: productivity -- prosperity -- regions -- inequality; R11 -- R12; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 307.14
• DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2019.1619928
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0034-3404

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This paper examines the issue of whether the UK displays high levels of interregional inequality or only average levels of inequality. The question arises due to major differences in public perceptions. Following on from recent UK public debates, the UK evidence is examined in the context of 28 different indicators and 30 different Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Answering this question involves a careful consideration of the ways in which we use different spatial units of analysis, different measures of prosperity and different indices of inequality in order to understand interregional inequality, and the issues that arise are common to all countries. In the specific case of the UK, the result is clear. The UK is one of the most regionally unbalanced countries in the industrialized world.