A comparison of colour appearance for surface colours between outdoor and indoor environments. Issue 2 (11th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ou, Li‐Chen; Liang, Ya‐Chen
• Is Part Of: Color research & application. Volume 45:Issue 2(2020:Apr.)
• Page Start: 235
• Page End: 245
• Publication Date: 2019-12-11
• Subjects: CIECAM02 -- colour appearance -- outdoor environment; Color -- Periodicals; 535
• DOI: 10.1002/col.22459
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0361-2317

Abstract

Abstract: Psychophysical experiments of colour appearance, in terms of lightness, colourfulness, and hue, were conducted outdoors and indoors to investigate whether there was any difference in colour appearance between outdoor and indoor environments. A panel of 10 observers participated in the outdoor experiment, while 13 observers took part in the indoor experiment. The reference white had an average luminance of 12784 cd/m 2 in the outdoor experiment and 129 cd/m 2 in the indoor experiment. Test colours included 42 colour patches selected from the Practical Coordinate Color System to achieve a reasonable uniform distribution of samples in CIECAM02. Experimental results show that for both outdoor and indoor environments, there was good agreement between visual data and predicted values by CIECAM02 for the three colour appearance scales, with the coefficient of variation values all lower than 25 and the R 2 values all higher than 0.73, indicating little difference in the three dimensions of colour appearance between indoor and outdoor viewing conditions. Experimental data also suggest that the observers were more sensitive to variation in lightness for grayish colours than for highly saturated colours, a phenomenon that seems to relate with the Helmholtz‐Kohlrausch effect. This phenomenon was modeled for predicting perceived lightness (J′) using the present experimental data. The new J′ model was tested using three extra sets of visual data obtained both outdoors and indoors, showing good predictive performance of the new model, with an average coefficient of variation of 14, an average R 2 of 0.88, and an average STRESS index of 14.18.