The need for impact evaluation in electricity access research. (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The need for impact evaluation in electricity access research. (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- The need for impact evaluation in electricity access research
- Authors:
- Bayer, Patrick
Kennedy, Ryan
Yang, Joonseok
Urpelainen, Johannes - Abstract:
- Abstract: Universal household electrification is a key component of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, but the evidence base for social and economic impacts of electricity access remains unclear. Here we report results from a systematic review of impact evaluations of household electrification based on five key outcome measures. We only find 31 studies that conduct statistical hypothesis tests to assess impacts. Among these, seven draw on a randomized experiment designed for causal inference. The randomized experimental studies generate fewer positive results than observational or quasi-experimental studies, such as correlational, instrumental variable, and difference-in-differences designs. These results call for a reassessment of what we know about the impacts of household electrification. They also call for major investment in impact evaluation of electricity access using randomized controlled trials, with a particular focus on when and how energy access interventions can furnish large benefits to their intended beneficiaries. Large-scale impact evaluations using experimental methods will require close collaboration between policymakers and researchers. Highlights: We use a systematic review to identify rigorous impact evaluations of electricity access. We find only 31 studies that conduct statistical hypothesis tests to assess impacts. Experimental studies produce fewer positive impacts than observational studies. This result holds for differentAbstract: Universal household electrification is a key component of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, but the evidence base for social and economic impacts of electricity access remains unclear. Here we report results from a systematic review of impact evaluations of household electrification based on five key outcome measures. We only find 31 studies that conduct statistical hypothesis tests to assess impacts. Among these, seven draw on a randomized experiment designed for causal inference. The randomized experimental studies generate fewer positive results than observational or quasi-experimental studies, such as correlational, instrumental variable, and difference-in-differences designs. These results call for a reassessment of what we know about the impacts of household electrification. They also call for major investment in impact evaluation of electricity access using randomized controlled trials, with a particular focus on when and how energy access interventions can furnish large benefits to their intended beneficiaries. Large-scale impact evaluations using experimental methods will require close collaboration between policymakers and researchers. Highlights: We use a systematic review to identify rigorous impact evaluations of electricity access. We find only 31 studies that conduct statistical hypothesis tests to assess impacts. Experimental studies produce fewer positive impacts than observational studies. This result holds for different technologies, different outcomes, and inside/outside Africa. Large-scale impact evaluations require collaboration between policymakers and researchers. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 137(2020)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 137(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 137, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 137
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0137-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- Impact evaluation -- Electricity access -- Observational and experimental methods -- Causal inference -- Sustainable development
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111099 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12669.xml