Quantitative elastography of cervical stiffness during the three trimesters of pregnancy with a semiautomatic measurement program: A longitudinal prospective pilot study. Issue 2 (9th December 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Du, Liu; Lin, Mei‐Fang; Wu, Li‐Hong; Zhang, Li‐He; Zheng, Qiao; Gu, Yu‐Jun; Xie, Hong‐Ning
• Is Part Of: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. Volume 46:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 237
• Page End: 248
• Publication Date: 2019-12-09
• Subjects: cervix -- elastography -- reproducibility -- strain -- transvaginal ultrasound; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; 618.1005
• DOI: 10.1111/jog.14170
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-8076

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To assess the reproducibility of a semiautomatic quantification tool for cervical stiffness and evaluate the normal changes in cervical elasticity during the three trimesters of pregnancy. Methods: This longitudinal prospective pilot study evaluated cervical elasticity during the three trimesters of pregnancy (11–14, 20–24 and 28–32 weeks) in women with singleton pregnancies. Women with a history of conization, cerclage, cervical Naboth cysts (diameter > 10 mm), cervical tumors, or uterine malformation were excluded. A semiautomatic tool was used to evaluate the stiffness of the whole cervix and the internal and external cervical os with multiple quantitative elasticity parameters and the cervical length (CL) on the sagittal view via transvaginal elastography. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis were used to assess intra‐ and interobserver variability. E‐Cervix parameters during the three trimesters were compared using the Friedman test. Results: In total, 217 women with 651 strain examinations during the three trimesters were included. The intra‐ and interobserver ICC for the E‐Cervix parameters ranged from 0.947 to 0.991 and 0.855 to 0.989, respectively. There were significant differences in all parameters among the three trimesters. Cervical elasticity showed significant softening and became heterogeneous during the three trimesters. The median CL was significantly shorter in the first trimester than in the second and third trimesters ( P = 0.004, P < 0.001). Conclusion: E‐Cervix provides a graphical tool for operators to easily define regions of interest and obtain multiple repeatable measures of elasticity. The normal references for E‐Cervix parameters during the three trimesters reflect the physiological cervical changes during pregnancy.