Home-based exercise with telemonitoring guidance in patients with coronary artery disease: Does it improve long-term physical fitness?. (March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Avila, Andrea; Claes, Jomme; Buys, Roselien; Azzawi, May; Vanhees, Luc; Cornelissen, Veronique
• Is Part Of: European journal of preventive cardiology. Volume 27:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 377
• Publication Date: 2020-03
• Subjects: Cardiac rehabilitation -- telemonitoring -- exercise -- coronary artery disease; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cardiac patients -- Rehabilitation -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1177/2047487319892201
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2047-4873

Abstract

Background: Home-based interventions might facilitate the lifelong uptake of a physically active lifestyle following completion of a supervised phase II exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. Yet, data on the long-term effectiveness of home-based exercise training on physical activity and exercise capacity are scarce. Objective: The purpose of the TeleRehabilitation in Coronary Heart disease (TRiCH) study was to compare the long-term effects of a short home-based phase III exercise programme with telemonitoring guidance to a prolonged centre-based phase III programme in coronary artery disease patients. The primary outcome was exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes included physical activity behaviour, cardiovascular risk profile and health-related quality of life. Methods: Ninety coronary artery disease patients (80 men) were randomly assigned to 3 months of home-based (30), centre-based (30) or a control group (30) on a 1:1:1 basis after completion of their phase II ambulatory cardiac rehabilitation programme. Outcome measures were assessed at discharge of the phase II programme and after one year. Results: Eighty patients (72 (91%) men; mean age 62.6 years) completed the one-year follow-up measurements. Exercise capacity and secondary outcomes were preserved in all three groups ( P time > 0.05 for all), irrespective of the intervention ( P interaction > 0.05 for all). Eighty-five per cent of patients met the international guidelines for physical activity ( P time < 0.05). No interaction effect was found for physical activity. Conclusion: Overall, exercise capacity remained stable during one year following phase II cardiac rehabilitation. Our home-based exercise intervention was as effective as centre-based and did not result in higher levels of exercise capacity and physical activity compared to the other two interventions. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047942.https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02047942