Regular insulin added to total parenteral nutrition vs subcutaneous glargine in non-critically ill diabetic inpatients, a multicenter randomized clinical trial: INSUPAR trial. Issue 2 (February 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Regular insulin added to total parenteral nutrition vs subcutaneous glargine in non-critically ill diabetic inpatients, a multicenter randomized clinical trial: INSUPAR trial. Issue 2 (February 2020)
- Main Title:
- Regular insulin added to total parenteral nutrition vs subcutaneous glargine in non-critically ill diabetic inpatients, a multicenter randomized clinical trial: INSUPAR trial
- Authors:
- Olveira, Gabriel
Abuín, Jose
López, Rafael
Herranz, Sandra
García-Almeida, Jose M.
García-Malpartida, Katherine
Ferrer, Mercedes
Cancer, Emilia
Luengo-Pérez, Luis M.
Álvarez, Julia
Aragón, Carmen
Ocón, María J.
García-Manzanares, Álvaro
Bretón, Irene
Serrano-Aguayo, Pilar
Pérez-Ferre, Natalia
López-Gómez, Juan J.
Olivares, Josefina
Arraiza, Carmen
Tejera, Cristina
Martín, Jorge D.
García, Sara
Abad, Ángel L.
Alhambra, María R.
Zugasti, Ana
Parra, Juan
Torrejón, Sara
Tapia, María J. - Abstract:
- Summary: Background: There is no established insulin regimen in T2DM patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Aims: To compare the effectiveness (metabolic control) and safety of two insulin regimens in patients with diabetes receiving TPN. Design: Prospective, open-label, multicenter, clinical trial on adult inpatients with type 2 diabetes on a non-critical setting with indication for TPN. Patients were randomized on one of these two regimens: 100% of RI on TPN or 50% of Regular insulin added to TPN bag and 50% subcutaneous GI. Data were analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle. Results: 81 patients were on RI and 80 on GI. No differences were observed in neither average total daily dose of insulin, programmed or correction, nor in capillary mean blood glucose during TPN infusion (165.3 ± 35.4 in RI vs 172.5 ± 43.6 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.25). Mean capillary glucose was significantly lower in the GI group within two days after TPN interruption (160.3 ± 45.1 in RI vs 141.7 ± 43.8 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.024). The percentage of capillary glucose above 180 mg/dL was similar in both groups. The rate of capillary glucose ≤70 mg/dL, the number of hypoglycemic episodes per 100 days of TPN, and the percentage of patients with non-severe hypoglycemia were significantly higher on GI group. No severe hypoglycemia was detected. No differences were observed in length of stay, infectious complications, or hospital mortality. Conclusion: Effectiveness of both regimens was similar. GISummary: Background: There is no established insulin regimen in T2DM patients receiving parenteral nutrition. Aims: To compare the effectiveness (metabolic control) and safety of two insulin regimens in patients with diabetes receiving TPN. Design: Prospective, open-label, multicenter, clinical trial on adult inpatients with type 2 diabetes on a non-critical setting with indication for TPN. Patients were randomized on one of these two regimens: 100% of RI on TPN or 50% of Regular insulin added to TPN bag and 50% subcutaneous GI. Data were analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle. Results: 81 patients were on RI and 80 on GI. No differences were observed in neither average total daily dose of insulin, programmed or correction, nor in capillary mean blood glucose during TPN infusion (165.3 ± 35.4 in RI vs 172.5 ± 43.6 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.25). Mean capillary glucose was significantly lower in the GI group within two days after TPN interruption (160.3 ± 45.1 in RI vs 141.7 ± 43.8 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.024). The percentage of capillary glucose above 180 mg/dL was similar in both groups. The rate of capillary glucose ≤70 mg/dL, the number of hypoglycemic episodes per 100 days of TPN, and the percentage of patients with non-severe hypoglycemia were significantly higher on GI group. No severe hypoglycemia was detected. No differences were observed in length of stay, infectious complications, or hospital mortality. Conclusion: Effectiveness of both regimens was similar. GI group achieved better metabolic control after TPN interruption but non-severe hypoglycemia rate was higher in the GI group. Clinical trial registry: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02706119 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical nutrition. Volume 39:Issue 2(2020)
- Journal:
- Clinical nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 39:Issue 2(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 39, Issue 2 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 39
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0039-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 388
- Page End:
- 394
- Publication Date:
- 2020-02
- Subjects:
- Non-critically ill patient -- Diabetes -- Insulin regimen -- Glargine insulin -- TPN
GI Glargine Insulin -- RI Regular Insulin -- SGA Subjective Global Assessment -- T2DM Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus -- TPN Total Parenteral Nutrition
Critically ill -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Diet therapy -- Periodicals
Parenteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral feeding -- Periodicals
Enteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Parenteral Nutrition -- Periodicals
Metabolism -- Periodicals
Diétothérapie -- Périodiques
Alimentation parentérale -- Périodiques
Alimentation entérale -- Périodiques
Nutrition -- Périodiques
Diet therapy
Enteral feeding
Nutrition
Parenteral feeding
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
615.854 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02615614 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.02.036 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0261-5614
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.314500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12651.xml