294PValidation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with long-term follow-up. (24th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 294PValidation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with long-term follow-up. (24th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- 294PValidation of the 8th edition of AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Results from a non-endemic cohort with long-term follow-up
- Authors:
- Wu, L-R
He, X - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: This study aimed to validate the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic region. Methods: We recruited 614 patients with histology-proven, previously untreated, non-metastatic NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at our center. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (TD-ROC) analysis were applied to compare the prognostic discrimination between the 7th and 8th edition staging system. Results: For T category, the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) Kaplan-Meier curves of T1, T2 and T3 were well separated in the 8th edition; however, LRFS did not significantly differ between T3 and T4 (P = 0.15). Moreover, the 7th edition achieved higher c-index (0.703 [95% CI, 0.618-0.788] vs. 0.686 [95% CI, 0.604-0.768]) and area under curve ([AUC], 5-year: 0.681 vs. 0.672; 10-year: 0.645 vs. 0.615) than 8th edition for LRFS. With regard to N category, the 8th edition achieved higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.847] vs. 0.757 [95% CI, . 0.704-0.811]) and AUC (5-year 0.728 vs. 0.685; 10-year: 0.748 vs. 0.680) for distant metastasis-free survival. In terms of overall stage, the 8th edition also had higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.845] vs. 0.724 [95% CI, 0.676-0.773]) and AUC (5-year: 0.730 vs. 0.713; 10-year: 0.734 vs. 0.677) compared with 7th edition forAbstract: Background: This study aimed to validate the 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control (AJCC/UICC) TNM staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in a non-endemic region. Methods: We recruited 614 patients with histology-proven, previously untreated, non-metastatic NPC treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) at our center. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (TD-ROC) analysis were applied to compare the prognostic discrimination between the 7th and 8th edition staging system. Results: For T category, the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) Kaplan-Meier curves of T1, T2 and T3 were well separated in the 8th edition; however, LRFS did not significantly differ between T3 and T4 (P = 0.15). Moreover, the 7th edition achieved higher c-index (0.703 [95% CI, 0.618-0.788] vs. 0.686 [95% CI, 0.604-0.768]) and area under curve ([AUC], 5-year: 0.681 vs. 0.672; 10-year: 0.645 vs. 0.615) than 8th edition for LRFS. With regard to N category, the 8th edition achieved higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.847] vs. 0.757 [95% CI, . 0.704-0.811]) and AUC (5-year 0.728 vs. 0.685; 10-year: 0.748 vs. 0.680) for distant metastasis-free survival. In terms of overall stage, the 8th edition also had higher c-index (0.800 [95% CI, 0.755-0.845] vs. 0.724 [95% CI, 0.676-0.773]) and AUC (5-year: 0.730 vs. 0.713; 10-year: 0.734 vs. 0.677) compared with 7th edition for overall survival. Conclusions: The 8th edition of AJCC/UICC TNM staging system achieved significantly better prognostic discrimination than the 7th edition with regard to N category and overall stage but not T category. Legal entity responsible for the study: Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Medical University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research. Funding: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81672989; No. 81872192). Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of oncology. Volume 30(2019)Supplement 9
- Journal:
- Annals of oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2019)Supplement 9
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-24
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
616.992 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/annonc/mdz428.008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0923-7534
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1043.320000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12648.xml