160PClinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy after progression on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. (24th November 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 160PClinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy after progression on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. (24th November 2019)
- Main Title:
- 160PClinical outcomes of second-line chemotherapy after progression on nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- Authors:
- Ha, J
Bang, K
Yoo, C
Jeong, J
Chang, H-M
Oh, D
Song, T J
Park, D H
Lee, S S
Lee, S K
Kim, M-H
Park, J-H
Kim, K-P
Ryoo, B-Y - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Since the introduction of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P + GEM) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), optimal second-line (2L) chemotherapy after progression is unclear. We assessed clinical outcomes of 2L chemotherapy for disease that progressed on 1L nab-P + GEM. Methods: Among the 203 patients previously treated with 1L nab-P + GEM for mPDAC at Asan Medical Center, between February and December 2016, records of 120 patients receiving 2L chemotherapy after progression on nab-P + GEM were retrospectively reviewed. The response rate and survival were evaluated along with analysis of prognostic factors. Results: Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets (FOLFOX or XELOX) were used in 78 patients (65.0%), fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in 37 (30.8%), and liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil in 2 (1.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.29 months and 7.33 month from the start of 2L therapy. Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin regimens and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy did not yield significantly different median PFS (2.89 vs 3.81 months, P = 0.40) or OS (7.04 vs 7.43 months, P = 0.86). A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (>2.2) and a short time to progression with 1L nab-P + GEM (<6.4 months) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS with 2L therapy. Conclusions: 2L fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy after failure of 1L nab-P + GEM hadAbstract: Background: Since the introduction of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P + GEM) as first-line (1L) treatment for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC), optimal second-line (2L) chemotherapy after progression is unclear. We assessed clinical outcomes of 2L chemotherapy for disease that progressed on 1L nab-P + GEM. Methods: Among the 203 patients previously treated with 1L nab-P + GEM for mPDAC at Asan Medical Center, between February and December 2016, records of 120 patients receiving 2L chemotherapy after progression on nab-P + GEM were retrospectively reviewed. The response rate and survival were evaluated along with analysis of prognostic factors. Results: Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets (FOLFOX or XELOX) were used in 78 patients (65.0%), fluoropyrimidine monotherapy in 37 (30.8%), and liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil in 2 (1.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.29 months and 7.33 month from the start of 2L therapy. Fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin regimens and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy did not yield significantly different median PFS (2.89 vs 3.81 months, P = 0.40) or OS (7.04 vs 7.43 months, P = 0.86). A high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (>2.2) and a short time to progression with 1L nab-P + GEM (<6.4 months) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS with 2L therapy. Conclusions: 2L fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin doublets and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy after failure of 1L nab-P + GEM had modest efficacy, with no differences in treatment outcomes between them. Further investigation is warranted for the optimal 2L chemo-regimens and sequencing of systemic chemotherapy for patients with mPDAC. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of oncology. Volume 30(2019)Supplement 9
- Journal:
- Annals of oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 30(2019)Supplement 9
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 9 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0030-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-11-24
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
616.992 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/annonc/mdz422.037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0923-7534
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1043.320000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12646.xml