Intracoronary pressure increase due to contrast injection for optical coherence tomography imaging. Issue 3 (March 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shimamura, Kunihiro; Kubo, Takashi; Ino, Yasushi; Shiono, Yasutsugu; Matsuo, Yoshiki; Kitabata, Hironori; Terada, Kosei; Emori, Hiroki; Katayama, Yosuke; Khalifa, Amir Kh. M.; Takahata, Masahiro; Wada, Teruaki; Higashioka, Daisuke; Kashiwagi, Manabu; Kuroi, Akio; Tanaka, Atsushi; Hozumi, Takeshi; Akasaka, Takashi
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiology. Volume 75:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 296
• Page End: 301
• Publication Date: 2020-03
• Subjects: Angiography -- Coronary artery disease -- Fractional flow reserve -- Optical coherence tomography; Cardiology -- Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.08.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0914-5087

Abstract

Highlights: We measured coronary pressure during contrast injection for optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angiography (CAG). Coronary pressure increased due to contrast injection in both OCT and CAG. Contrast injection for OCT induced significant but small increase in intracoronary pressure compared with angiography. Abstract: Background: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) requires intracoronary injection of contrast media to remove blood from the field of view during image acquisition. Contrast injection may cause a temporal increase in intracoronary pressure. The aim of this study was to compare the intracoronary pressure during contrast injection between OCT and coronary angiography. Methods: We measured intracoronary pressure by using a pressure guidewire during contrast injection for OCT and angiography in 30 coronary arteries (mean fractional flow reserve = 0.90 ± 0.03). Contrast media was injected into coronary artery through the guiding catheter by using a mechanical injector pump. Results: Intracoronary pressure before contrast injection was similar between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 123 ± 18 mmHg vs. 122 ± 19 mmHg, p = 0.863). Intracoronary pressure was increased due to contrast injection in both OCT (systolic pressure: 123 ± 18 mmHg to 132 ± 18 mmHg, p < 0.001) and angiography (systolic pressure: 122 ± 19 mmHg to 128 ± 19 mmHg, p < 0.001). The increase in intracoronary pressure was slightly greater in OCT compared with angiography (absolute increase of systolic pressure: 9 ± 2 mmHg vs. 6 ± 1 mmHg, p < 0.001; and relative increase of systolic pressure: 8 ± 2% vs. 5 ± 1%, p < 0.001). Intracoronary pressure during contrast injection was not significantly different between OCT and angiography (systolic pressure: 132 ± 18 mmHg vs. 128 ± 19 mmHg, p = 0.831). Conclusions: Contrast injection for OCT induced significant but small increase in intracoronary pressure compared with that for angiography.