Tools for identifying partisan gerrymandering with an application to congressional districting in Pennsylvania. (January 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Tools for identifying partisan gerrymandering with an application to congressional districting in Pennsylvania. (January 2020)
- Main Title:
- Tools for identifying partisan gerrymandering with an application to congressional districting in Pennsylvania
- Authors:
- Cervas, Jonathan R.
Grofman, Bernard - Abstract:
- Abstract: In League of Women Voters v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2018) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down as a "severe and durable" partisan gerrymander the congressional map drawn by Republicans in 2011 and used in elections from 2012-2016. It did so entirely on state law grounds after a three-judge federal court had rejected issuing a preliminary injunction against the plan. After Pennsylvania failed to enact a lawful remedy plan of its own (due to total disagreement as to how to proceed between the newly elected Democratic governor and the still Republican-controlled legislature), the Court then ordered into place for the 2018 election a map of its own drawn for it by a court-appointed consultant. In a split court, the Court map was endorsed only by judges with Democratic affiliations. Here we compare the 2011 and 2018 congressional maps in terms of a variety of proposed metrics for detecting partisan gerrymandering. We also examine the remedy map proposed by a group of Republican legislators and that proposed by the Democratic governor. We conclude that the 2011 map was a blatant and undisguised pro-Republican gerrymander. Moreover, the remedy map proposed by Republican legislators was a covert pro-Republican gerrymander (what we refer to as a "stealth gerrymander"). The Democratic governor's proposed plan cannot be classified as a pro-Democratic gerrymander and indeed has, if anything, a slight pro-Republican tilt. The 2018 court-drawn remedial map, by allAbstract: In League of Women Voters v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2018) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down as a "severe and durable" partisan gerrymander the congressional map drawn by Republicans in 2011 and used in elections from 2012-2016. It did so entirely on state law grounds after a three-judge federal court had rejected issuing a preliminary injunction against the plan. After Pennsylvania failed to enact a lawful remedy plan of its own (due to total disagreement as to how to proceed between the newly elected Democratic governor and the still Republican-controlled legislature), the Court then ordered into place for the 2018 election a map of its own drawn for it by a court-appointed consultant. In a split court, the Court map was endorsed only by judges with Democratic affiliations. Here we compare the 2011 and 2018 congressional maps in terms of a variety of proposed metrics for detecting partisan gerrymandering. We also examine the remedy map proposed by a group of Republican legislators and that proposed by the Democratic governor. We conclude that the 2011 map was a blatant and undisguised pro-Republican gerrymander. Moreover, the remedy map proposed by Republican legislators was a covert pro-Republican gerrymander (what we refer to as a "stealth gerrymander"). The Democratic governor's proposed plan cannot be classified as a pro-Democratic gerrymander and indeed has, if anything, a slight pro-Republican tilt. The 2018 court-drawn remedial map, by all measures, was not a gerrymander. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Political geography. Volume 76(2020)
- Journal:
- Political geography
- Issue:
- Volume 76(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 76, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 76
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0076-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-01
- Subjects:
- Gerrymandering -- Pennsylvania supreme court -- Redistricting -- League of women voters -- Good government
Political geography -- Periodicals
Géographie politique -- Périodiques
320.12 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09626298 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102069 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0962-6298
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6543.885950
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 12624.xml