Greater effect of warming on community composition with increased precipitation and in moister landscape location. (24th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ronk, Argo; Liancourt, Pierre; Boldgiv, Bazartseren; Petraitis, Peter S.; Casper, Brenda B.
• Editors: Pugnaire, Francisco
• Is Part Of: Journal of vegetation science. Volume 31:Number 1(2020:Jan.)
• Page Start: 3
• Page End: 13
• Publication Date: 2019-11-24
• Subjects: abundance -- biodiversity -- canonical analysis -- climate change -- grassland -- open‐top chamber -- species cover -- warming; Plant ecology -- Periodicals; Plant communities -- Periodicals; Plant populations -- Periodicals; 581.7
• DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12813
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1100-9233

Abstract

Abstract: Questions: We asked how plant community composition responded to experimentally produced warmer and drier climate conditions at the landscape scale with existing variation in local species composition and environmental conditions. We aimed to identify changes in community composition overall and the species with greatest response in abundance, and hypothesized that locally restricted species may be more sensitive to warming than more widespread species within the landscape based on the assumption that they have a narrower niche breadth with respect to environmental conditions. Location: Semiarid, northern Mongolian steppe. Methods: Open‐top passive warming chambers (OTCs) elevated temperatures at two slope locations that differed in elevation, degree of slope, environmental conditions, and species composition. The OTC treatment was crossed with watering on the drier upper slope. Community composition differences among treatments were examined using canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP), which identified species contributing the most to differences. In response to warming, we also compared species locally restricted to one slope location with locally widespread species. Results: Open‐top passive warming chambers affected community composition more where soil moisture was greater, at the lower slope location and where warming was combined with supplemental watering on the drier upper slope. Locally restricted species responded negatively to the OTC while locally widespread species showed no overall response. Conclusions: Community composition responses to warming differ even within the landscape over and above the initial differences that exist in community structure and abiotic factors. Our results suggest that a warmer and drier climate will impact community composition sooner under more mesic conditions, affect locally restricted species more strongly, and reduce variation in species composition across the landscape. To better predict community responses to future warming, we must consider combined and interactive effects with changes in precipitation and extant water availability. Abstract : In the Mongolia steppe, changes in plant community composition with experimental warming depend on precipitation and vary within the landscape. Warming affects locally restricted species more strongly, reducing variation in community composition at the landscape scale. We predict climate change will not produce consistent responses in plant communities across the landscape and will have greater consequences in more mesic locations.