Development and evaluation of swine vesicular disease isotype‐specific antibody ELISAs based on recombinant virus‐like particles. Issue 1 (9th October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Ming; Gagliardi, Kayla; McIntyre, Leanne; Xu, Wanhong; Goolia, Melissa; Ambagala, Thanuja; Brocchi, Emiliana; Grazioli, Santina; Hooper–McGrevy, Kathleen; Nfon, Charles; Clavijo, Alfonso
• Is Part Of: Transboundary and emerging diseases. Volume 67:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 406
• Page End: 416
• Publication Date: 2019-10-09
• Subjects: antibody detection -- antigen -- isotype ELISA -- Swine vesicular disease virus -- virus‐like particles; Veterinary medicine -- Periodicals; 636.089
• DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13363
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1865-1674

Abstract

Abstract: Swine vesicular disease (SVD) is a contagious viral disease of pigs. The clinical signs of SVD are indistinguishable from other vesicular diseases, such as senecavirus A infection (SVA) and foot‐and‐mouth disease (FMD). Rapid and accurate diagnostic tests of SVD are considered essential in countries free of vesicular diseases. Competitive ELISA (cELISA) is the serological test used routinely. However, although cELISA is the standard test for SVD antibody testing, this test produces a small number of false‐positive results, which caused problems in international trade. The current project developed a SVD isotype antibody ELISA using recombinant SVD virus‐like particles (VLP) and an SVD‐specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) to reduce the percentage of false positives. The diagnostic specificities of SVD‐VLP isotype ELISAs were 98.7% and 99.6% for IgM and IgG. The SVD isotype ELISAs were SVD‐specific, without cross‐reactivity to other vesicular diseases. A panel of 16 SVD‐positive reference sera was evaluated using the SVD‐VLP isotype ELISAs. All sera were correctly identified as positive by the two combined SVD‐VLP isotype ELISAs. Comparison of the test results showed a high level of correlation between the SVDV antigen isotype ELISAs and SVD‐VLP isotype ELISAs. 303 sera from animals lacking clinical signs and history of SVDV exposure were identified positive using SVD cELISA. These samples were examined using SVD‐VLP isotype ELISAs. Of the 303 serum samples, five were positive for IgM, and five of 303 were positive for IgG. Comparable to virus neutralization test results, SVD isotype ELISAs significantly reduced the false‐positive samples. Based on above test results, the combined use of cELISA and isotype ELISAs can reduce the number of false‐positive samples and the use of time‐consuming virus neutralization tests, with benefit for international trade in swine and related products.